Meade lx200 vs celestron cpc.

Meade lx200 vs celestron cpc Based on all the articles and formum threads, I have narrowed it down to Used 8 LX200 GPS, New Celestron 8SE or New Celestron C8SGT. It works well except for one weird feature - it cant seem to hold focus Jan 31, 2022 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade 8 inch APC scopes (lx85 or LX 200) vs Celestron 8 inch - posted in Cats & Casses: Looking at getting a cat, and the 8 inch scopes look like the place to start. Celestron or Meade? Any experience suggestion? Which coating is better? Mount? Motors? Due to size, I can manage a CPC800 or a LX200 8. Oct 25, 2006 · Three spring-loaded base pin lock screws fix the mount base to the tripod. Im a visual observer only, and the contortions required at times by a GEM put my arthritic body to the test; so Im leaning toward an alt-az mount. I noticed that CPC925 is very good for astrophotography and visual use due to optical design that Celestron mentions. 25HD CPC --$3200 You have to ask is the 2" eyepiece, the 2" diagonal, the built in GPS and other goodies that the Celestron brings to the table worth the extra $1000. The big thing for me on the Celestron Nexstar is it is a single Fork vs. 25 vs Meade LX200 Classic 10 - posted in Cats & Casses: I know these questions get asked all the time so apologies if you are sick of answering them!!Have recently reignited my interest in astronomy and have been a hobbyist photographer for years so the next logical step is to go the astrophotography route. Is Meade better than Celestron? Celestron have the upper hand on Meade? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? May 22, 2011 · - Meade LX200 10" (or 8") - Meade LX90 10" (or 8") - Celestron C9. Celestron is a tad easier to hook up to a computer since they use the micro USB form factor so no special RS-232 cord is required to directly connect up. lx200 style wedge. Sep 15, 2012 · Page 1 of 3 - Meade or Celestron - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello Fellow CN Members:In a previous post I indicated I was looking to get back into an SCT again after having owned an Celestron NexStar 8SE which I sold after a couple of years of viewing with it. Im unclear whether the LX200R, CGE Jan 22, 2011 · CPC1100 GPS -or- 12 Meade LX90-SC - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I finished building my 18 Dob last year and now want to compliment it with an 11 or 12 inch SCT. Mar 10, 2007 · Celestron vs Meade - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: good day everyone,I`m new to the forum and I`m also looking for a scope of my onw. 1850. Portability is my primary concern because Ill have to move my entire setup a few hundred Oct 29, 2022 · Celestron c9. For visual I'd lean towards the Evo as being a bit lighter and fun to use (similar to the Meade Lightswitch). Meade 10 LX200 classic Orion EON 120mm ed refractor on a Meade LX-75 mount 80mm Guide scope WO binoviewer Jul 8, 2005 · meade LX200 12" vs. Purchasing Question Hello Trying to decide to choose between the two but need guidance. Celestron SCTs - posted in Cats & Casses: Im in the market for a 8 SCT and after doing a few searches, I became interested in the CPC series from Celstron. I am not building an observatory. Celestron CPC 925 GPS, CPC Deluxe 925 HD, CPC 1100 GPS, CPC Deluxe 1100 HD, NexStar 9 ¼ GPS, NexStar 11 GPS. ggf sind die neueren Modelle von Meade etwas besser (optisch). However, if imaging is in your future the LX90 mount is nice (the LX200 is better) and the ACF optics are fantastic! Two excellent scopes to choose from. 2) Optics - I hear that the C-11 has better optics, but the LX200 has the flat field. May 18, 2008 · The Celestron 11" Optical Tube Assembly (OTA) is the same regardless of whether you get it on the CPC, AGST (CG-5) or CGE; only the mounts differ. Stay away from the RCX! Hi Paul, Oh my are they still having problems with the high end RCX line? Feb 21, 2008 · I have another question. 25, Celestron C-11 2. Use wise between the Celestron and Meade is largely a matter of personal preference. Until then I am going to do some researching. This is no doubt a function of the coatings. Oct 4, 2010 · I know the Meade mount has been used for years, but the C-11 is lighter. I do some basic May 12, 2012 · It is surprising that Celestron still has the plug-in jacks in the rotating surface. Celestron CPC 8 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello everyone, I came across the forums while researching my next telescope and was quite impressed with the level of knowledge and help. NexStar i vs NexStar CPC - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I really want to get another scope and Im currently saving and should have enough money buy the end of July. I soon found myself with a C8, C9. L équivalent du cpc c est le lx200 le 90 est plus light j avais failli acheté un lx200 For a comparison I had my c8 setup next to the CPC. 25, C11, and a Meade LX-200 R(ACF) 12” OTA’s. Aber bei einem "guten Preis" würde ich zum C-11 greifen, sollte es deutsch montiert sein. Our selection of catadioptric telescopes range in price and complexity, so everyone from amateurs to experienced astronomers can find the right telescope. Visual observing is primary. Whichever you go with May 23, 2012 · As I understand it, the optics of Meade and Celestron are quite closely matched, but that Meade has an iffy reputation with its electronics. I know Celestrons are the most popular, and I think I understand the differences between the standard on the HD. I use a dolly for my current mount, and you could pursue the option of purchasing a Scopebuggy or similar wheeled transport to alleviate the issue of moving the scope if needed. Not sure if that is still the case, and I have had only good experiences with the Meade optics I have used (one 14mm UWA EP, now swapped for a Nagler 12T4, based on eye relief, not optical quality, and the Celestron-NexStar telescopes come in computerized versions, with Wi-Fi modules that can connect directly to your mobile device via the SkyPortal app. It looks like the Celestron gets slightly better reviews, particularly for ease of setup (due to handle locations, etc. The Meade LX200 is a fully computerized AZ mount equipped with Autostar II GoTo system. I have my Classic 8 wedge on a Meade field tripod. As any folk here know,your nexstar or CPC will live long before we all die and Jul 14, 2020 · Page 1 of 3 - Updated opinions on CPC 1100 GPS vs LX200 10” GPS - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello folks, I am re-entering the hobby and I find myself dealing with a conundrum, I am unsure of if which telescope to choose. The LX200 costs more, but you definitely get what you pay for. 3) Customer service - I've been happy with Celestron so far and I've heard bad things about Meade. I work at a small college, and our Meade LX200 Classic shorted out its hand controller; since they dont make them anymore, this seems like a good opportunity to get a bigger, better telescope. 25 Does this also include the CPC 9. Meade, on […] Dec 28, 2016 · At least their weights seem more aligned and so applications. Oct 3, 2007 · Further (beginner) questions LX90GPS vs CPC 800 - posted in Cats & Casses: Folks. Meade LX600 12” f/8 VS Celestron CGEM II 1100 EDGEHD . Having learned from previous experience that its better for me to save up and buy what I want rather than to buy lesser intermediate things that I can afford earlier, I have now saved enough Nov 11, 2017 · The price is a bit cheaper than the CPC Edge HD but the LX200 models seem to be the higher end Meade products. Apr 20, 2020 · Meade 12" ACF LX90how stable are the forks? - posted in Cats & Casses: I am looking at purchasing a large aperture SCT, either the Celestron CPC 1100 or the Meade 12 ACF LX90. Im unclear whether the LX200R Jul 12, 2023 · The LX200 12" vs the modern CPC1100 is a bigger beast and if you were going for a permanent mounting or mounting on a dolly system I'd always go with the LX200 as most cables are on the base except the DEC cable. Glass lenses inside these telescope grab light and bend it to produce an image. Thanks Apr 12, 2019 · Page 1 of 2 - Help deciding on new scope: the SCT versus Dobsonian debate (CPC 1100 HD versus Orion 16g truss-tube Dob) - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): Dear All, Many thanks for looking at my post. I noticed that Meade has a new LX90 ACF 10inch with a weight of 50lbs and the 12 inch has a weight of 60 lbs. Schon allein aus Zeit- und Kostengründen wird es auf absehbare Zeit vermutlich beim Beobachten bleiben. As to your question on optics re Celestron 9. But a C11 is somewhat out of the budget. The 8” LX200 ACF clocks in at 45 lbs vs. If I don't need goto, the Celestron is lighter and faster to set up. Aug 8, 2007 · meade 10 LX200 or Celeston 11 CPC , pros and cons? - posted in Cats & Casses: Well Im ready for a new scope. I'm comparing the CPC 1100 with the LX90, the scope I'm interested in, NOT the 12" LX200, which is 15 pounds heavier. Aug 6, 2007 · C11 oder 12"SC von Meade geben sich optisch nichts. Celestron C-14 OTA CG Aug 29, 2018 · Older (pre-Goto) Celestron wedges attach to the tripod with three 5/16" bolts. Since the majority of dedicated cameras being used by amateurs today are at most APS-C the ACF design hangs quite well against the Edge design which REQUIRES a dedicated reducer at Aug 21, 2017 · 8” LX200 – 45 pounds 8” CPC – 51 pounds. Yes, I know this subject may bring some debate and I am not trying to fuel any fires here!I used to own LX200 10 but it was too heavy for us and it didnt fit in our car, so we sold it. It has a nice handle on the side of the fork and a grove on the bottom of the opposite fork for your hand. I already read the suggestions of my earlier post about the LX90 vs the Celestron Evolution 8. Meade Lx-90 8 - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): It seems you can buy either one of these right now for ~$1,799 + shipping. Both of these are Corrected SCTs and a CSCT just does better for imaging. 25 which in my opinion is the best of the bunch for image clarity,contrast etc and is a great performer for planetary Feb 22, 2008 · Celestron CPC vs CGE vs Meade LX200R - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Hello all. I have been observing with an Orion XT6 dob mounted newtonian for the last 5 years and am ready to step up to something more advanced. Three of our members now have Celestron CPC-11's. Compare Celestron NexStar Evolution 8 vs Meade LX200-ACF vs Meade LX65 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Jun 19, 2023 · Visit the specific Meade or Celestron forum and you'll see occassional issues with either mount, but not at a level to signal anyone should shy away from modern iterations of these telescopes. 25 vs. I do some basic See full list on theoptics. so initially between the 12”LX200 ACF and the CPC 11 Edge deluxe I would say optically most probably par for visuel observing with Meades optics Jul 11, 2007 · After months of looking at telescopes, I am down to the Meade LX90 10" or Celestron CPC 11', however it is difficult to determine the difference between these scopes. But for the OTA I'd be considering getting either the EdgeHD version of the Celestron scopes or the ACF version of the Meade SCT. Ive seem in this page some recorrent problems of meade telescopes and it seems the electronics allways burn,stop working or simlply goes dead. Now I'm looking at the Meade LX200 series, either the 8" or 10", since all of the jacks are stationaary on them. Meade has 2500 Jul 16, 2022 · If you're intending AP be aware the LX200 10" is better suited ergonomically from a cable management and mirror lock perspective. I am looking at the 10 Meade LX200 GPS w/ UHTC and one of the new Celestron CPCs (925 or 1100). I am thinking of finally droping the cash and picking up one of these two. heavier than that of the smaller Meade LX200 10” base/fork/OTA, and the CPC 1100’s total weight of 84 lbs is considerably less than the LX200 12” weight of 123 lbs. Konsens scheint zu sein, daß das LX200 deutlich solider und letztlich wohl auch präziser ist. Thanks! Jun 13, 2011 · Celestron CPC 925 vs Meade lightswitch LS 8-ACF - posted in Cats & Casses: Ok so i went out last year and purchased I mount that was way beyond my knowledge level. The setup of the CPC was easy to do with one person. The optical tube of Celestron and Meade 8" German Equatorial SCT or Newtonian telescopes (26" length maximum) CASEOTA11. Dec 31, 2017 · Quel choix faire entre un MEADE LX90 12" et le Celestron CPC1100 Merci. Although I know that this has been discussed before I am looking for more up to date and current Jul 1, 2020 · and some actually did prefer it to the C11 XLT for its brilliance on planetary observing and had a hint of a whisper of APO like views also. The weight handling capacity of the LX200 and LX600 forks are one reason Meade offers the 14" that way to this day. Price is even the same! For DSO, what would be better? the wedge or the Meade field derotator? Dec 23, 2024 · New Celestron CPC 9. Aug 6, 2020 · For example, 8" Meade lx200 gps telescope or a Celestron CPC 1100. Bei Gabelmontierung bei beiden Geräten würde ich den Preis entscheiden lassen. Focal Length The exact focal length of the reducer/telescope combo depends slightly on where in the optical path the SCT Corrector lens is placed. The thing I didn't like about the Meade was the over involved wedge mounting - the Celestron one is a single piece and very straight forward and simple to mount and set up. Celestron CPC 11 ?? - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): I am wanting to get a large (for me) aperture SCT. Ive seen a few posts on this and it seems the 11 is the more popular choice, but I have to assume that since Celestron has offered the 9. . Now I pose another question, which would you prefer, the Meade LX90 or the Celestron CPC 800?Lets look at the basic specs: Both have goto capability. and therefore it would be nice just to set the Jan 9, 2024 · The OTA of your LX-200 weighs 85 pounds without any thingies attached to it. the dual fork of the Meade. 25 is somehow better, he said visually it has no advantages. Aug 4, 2022 · C11 Vs. Please wait while your request is being verified May 15, 2018 · someone i know wants to sell it's 1990's meade lx200 10" what would be a reasoneable price? is this a good ota that would be useable on a modern mount? Edited by jlr1304, 15 May 2018 - 12:08 PM. many feel the CPC tripods are sturdier than anything Meade makes, and I wold say a majority tend to find the Celestron electronics more user friendly, but not by a wide margin. Firstly. Are they consider the same scope w/the same optics. 25 is the star of the range. Second part of my question relates to mounts - I have seen several of the mounts in the shops and seen them in action on youtube. All these are of good quality, and the finder scope adjustment bracket is good. 25 based on reviews i read that they are the same,W/The same optics. Other reports of poor customer service from Celestron are also troublesome. However, my thinking has evolved somewhat since then. The LX200 10 is about $1000 more than the 9. yes you will get a Meade following and also a celestron. I liked the 2004 LX200 GPS Jan 11, 2017 · The electronics are very similar but I find the Celestron a little more intuitive and user friendly making it a doddle to operate. But first: 1. is only 3 lbs. With similar features the Celestron is only 2-3lbs lighter. Let’s take a look at what I have found comparing these wonderful scopes! Testing: May 30, 2010 · Page 1 of 2 - meade LX 200 vs celestron nexstar or CPC - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi. Mar 15, 2011 · The meade has a higher rating as I have seen, but the nextstar has a much lower price tag. ISS Polarity Testers for Meade and Celestron Scope Power Sources Fused 12VDC Power Adapter Cable and Extension for LX200-GPS, LX90, ETX, LXD55 Fused 12VDC Power Adapter Cable and Extension for Celestron, AstroTrac Fused 12VDC Power Adapter Cable for Celestron, With Locking Ring Meade 7" Mak Fan Cable, 30" Long Mounting Bracket for 7AH Batteries Mar 21, 2024 · Celestron and Meade frequently offer options to buy ACF and Edge HD telescopes bundled with altitude-azimuth mounts. I am currently in a rut trying to figure out what SCT to get and from which company to buy from I want to stay within 8 inches in apperature. My use would be in an observatory mounted on a wedge. The scope stays Mar 17, 2012 · I suppose the Meade lx200 acf 8" is equivalent to the Celestron cpc800 edgeHD, in terms of optics and add ons. Below the OTA there are some . So I think Celestron and Meade are doing a great job. I currently have a celestron 8 go-to. I believe the meade fork has gears that are not metal. You opinion are welcome,Thanks, Paul Feb 22, 2008 · Celestron CPC vs CGE vs Meade LX200R - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hello all. Would I be better getting the 10inch meade? Is the CPC a higher quality scope that would make the weight difference irrelevant Nov 25, 2011 · Celestron CPC 800 vs. This started to change when I acquired a Losmandy g11 mount. I can't wait to get Feb 17, 2010 · As far as Meade scopes, I would not take one if it was given to me. Feb 27, 2005 · NexStar GPS vs. Also some concerns from reading various blogs about reliability with Meade Feb 12, 2015 · With the Meade you have a full up finder; you do not with the Celestron. Ive never used a Meade, so now I wonder what woulde be better. Anyone have any thoughts on what they may prefer? Beach Camera has them both for aprox. Feb 23, 2020 · I own both Celestron (no Evo though) and Meade ACF (including the LX90). Even the LX90 ACF is more expensive than the CPC, but only marginally, probably due to a marinally larger aperture. I already own a Skyquest 6 inch dob and wanting to step up a bit. Nov 20, 2011 · Meade ACF 8" LX90 vs. Dec 20, 2007 · 2" accessories and/or focal reducers will fit on the CPC but not the LX90. 25 SGT XLT (CG5) - Meade LT 8" I have heard the Meade ACF optics are excellent and that the C9. Id like some advise from folks that have used both. I was looking at the two. That would be a more fair comparison to the CPC. SCT 11" OTA : CASEOTA14. As for Edge vs ACF vs standard the advantage the edge holds is vs non-ACF/non-EDGE optics to give a flat field for LARGER sensors. They appear to be slightly different externally. I am currently an owner of a Celestron 8 Newtonian and am looking to upgrade to a quality GOTO. 2. It can also make one think the contrast is a little better on the Meade. No dobs allowed. I’ve pretty much settled on the Meade LX200 series. Both have double tine forks Dec 23, 2021 · The Meade 14" with D size dovetail is 57# as I recall, not 63#. Aug 26, 2017 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade 12" ACF LX90 vs. Im new to this group but have been involved with Astronomy in one form or another for almost all my life. 25 CPC. I am tossing up whether or not it would be worth the extra money for the 200. Everyone in our club that has purchased one has had problems. et bien, passes dans notre association, OPF à Hyères, tu pourras essayer du cpc8, nextar8, du skywtacher ou du meade lx200. So far, Ive narrowed my choices down to Meade LX200 8 or 10 Classic. So what to choose?If I just look at the specs, I would like to point out the obvious. Sep 18, 2013 · Page 1 of 10 - Meade LX600-ACF 12 f/8 or CPC1100 - posted in Cats & Casses: Looking at buying either the 12 LX600 or the CPC1100 but torn between the two. It is quite comfortable to grab the CPC, and is a bit better in my opinion then the Meade LX scopes. LX200 - Visual or EAA Only - Differences? - posted in Cats & Casses: Im considering an aperture jump to 11-12 in a couple years and want to stick with SCTs. Im looking at Celestron options as well but thought Id use this opportunity to understand differences between the LX90 and LX200. This brand offers a wide range of telescopes for amateurs and professionals, ensuring cutting-edge technology and clear, crisp imagery. It was the same money at the time and has one inch more aperture. Meade states that it has an oversize Jun 20, 2014 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade LX90 8 or CPC 800 8? - posted in Cats & Casses: I have made a decision to buy an 8" goto telescope. I have to admit that I miss having an SCT due to the comfortable viewing position and its general ability to provide good views. The LX200 has a greater clearance there. but the new celestron goto sytem looks interesting. I currently have a 10 Meade Wide Field (deforked LX200, native F6. I know the Celestron CPC will be a sturdy double fork platform for astro imaging, but what about the Meade LX90 12. I woder what the difference between Celestron Nexstar and Meade LX200GPS is?is it a quality issue?is it a matter of price?I`d like to get me a scope with Goto feature for visual observation mainly. Both scopes have superior optics Jun 8, 2009 · Page 1 of 2 - CPC 1100 vs Meade 12 LX90/200 - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Hi guys, Im considering buying one of these scopes, and I have some questions for you, experienced guys, out there. BTW, I've had my LX-200 for five years with no electronic issues. Does anyone have any experience with the Meade 14 That is one of the fre scopes I have never looked through. Have tried to lift the OTA on Meade LX600 as dont have observatory set-up but is v heavy even with split fork (although do have an engine crane which could do it!). 25" vs the 11" OTA's; Here's the 11" OTA vs a Meade 127mm refractor; And finally, here's a copy of his message in the Cat's and Cass's forum where he linked a number of his tests using the Meade and Celestron telescopes: Here are some links to long threads with a lot of images. The case includes four latches (two lockable) for the removable cover (no hinge), three steel-reinforced handles and die-cut foam lining with compartments for telescope, eyepieces and accessories. Sure an LX90 or standard CPC (not the HD) might have a bit less robustness than an EQ6, but both the LX200 and CPC HD mounts are very much capable of very fine performance. Views are great. 25 vs Meade LX90-ACF - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I have been debating on buying a CPC 9. Thanks for the advise, I am going to pick up the Celestron CPC 800 next week. Prior to the LX200, Meade used pretty much the same arrangement. 00. Meade 8 or Jun 6, 2015 · Page 1 of 2 - Feedback on used Meade LX200 EMC 8inch scope - posted in Cats & Casses: Im looking at an used Meade LX200 EMC GOTO (non gps)scope listed for $775 locally. The GPS and CPC are in the same price Performance The diagram above shows how the SCT Corrector improves the off-axis spot size on a Celestron 11" SCT. Images appear flatter, crisper and are sharper across the entire visual field. I sold Dec 20, 2018 · Problem Focusing with Meade CPC 1100 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello Folks. An amazing choice for deep-space astrophotography, the Meade LX200 ACF telescopes come in 8-inch, 10-inch, 12-inch, 14 Inch and even 16-inch models. The 45-pound LX200 fork/OTA assembly is heavier than any 8” or 10” Dobsonian optical tube I’ve had my hands on and is similar in weight to that of a solid-tubed 12” Dob. I may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. Other than aperture size, is there a big difference between the CPC 9. 12'' Meade LX200 Classic, 8'' Meade LX200 Classic, Celestron C-8, Celestron C-9. I get that you are a fan of Meade and I am not trolling here but IMO you would be much better off with the Celestron CPC 11" if you want a large alt/az scope. Compared to my 16" LX200 GPS a 14" mount looks so undersided. The talk here is about the C9. A Meade LX200 and Celestron of the same aperture are about $100 different in prices. Im impressed with the price and alleged ease of GoTo with the Meade 12 LX90 LNT but also the Celestron CPC 11. Meade 14" F/10 - posted in Cats & Casses: I have a CPC1100 and am looking at a older Meade LX200 14 telescope. I think, that one of these two scopes will find a new home for a long time. The original post was to compare the Meade 10" compared The Meade LX200 ACF includes all the field-proven features of the LX200 including GPS, Primary Mirror Lock, Oversized Primary Mirror, SmartDrive™, Smart Mount™, AutoStar® II. Nominally Sep 3, 2007 · LX90 GPS 12 vs Celestron CPC 1100 - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Has anyone ever compared the visual performance of these two scopes?Is that extra inch of aperature worth the 400$ extra?A Dec 31, 2017 · Quel choix faire entre un MEADE LX90 12" et le Celestron CPC1100 Merci. Daher beziehe ich mich ausdrücklich auf das LX200. It comes with Deluxe Field tripod ,eyepiece caddy, AutoStar hand controller, AC adapter, visual back, 2 Lumicon diagonal, counterweight bar with weight, all cables and adapters. If you want to do photography, I'd get CGE over any Alt-Az fork mount (Celestron or Meade), because imaging on a fork mount is a pain with a wedge and nearly impossible without. Back to top #4 Rusty Rusty. That's my old 12" LX200 in the photo, and yes, it really WAS a beast! HAL Jun 30, 2009 · Page 1 of 2 - Celestron C11 vs C9. I purchased my CPC 9. Because of shipping costs the difference between the two models is $280. Generic LX-200 Type Scopes. Seems pretty easy decision to me. CPC Deluxe 1100 - posted in Cats & Casses: I will soon have a new observatory, and I plan in the next year or two to buy a larger scope to put in it. In the low $2,000s, you have options such as the LX90 or the LX200. I have a celestar 8 that I want to Feb 24, 2006 · 10 Meade LX200 GPS or Celestron CPC 1100 - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: I am a 2 year etx-105 user and want to move up to a larger scope. thanks to all who answered my last post. 0. Celestron 8" CPC. Feb 16, 2017 · Page 1 of 2 - Should I get a 12" or 8" SCT in a Meade LX90 or LX200? - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): I’ve had a manual 4 alt-az refractor for a while, but Im in the market for my ultimate scope and think I would enjoy computerized for a change. Jun 9, 2011 · I have had my CPC1100 set up right next to a Meade 10 inch and could tell no difference. Apr 30, 2008 · While the 12" LX200 is 10 pounds heavier than the CPC 1100, the 12" LX90-ACF is actually 5 pounds LIGHTER than the CPC. Are the forks stable enough for Alt-Az imaging? I read somewhere that the forks and the OTA tend to Apr 4, 2010 · All the scope were very sharp and the mounts worked fine. NexStar 8SE - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: (re-posted in a more appropriated location)Hi all. The CPC weighs about ten pounds less. The LX90 also has PEC in RA; I don't believe the NextStar has any. There is a cult fan base for the 9. I have been an armchair astrophysicist for years and always dreamed of buying a telescope but between work, kids and other things never got around to it. I did a quick search of the forums and didnt see a recent post on this topic. Order a catadioptric telescope at High Point Scientific to bring your stargazing to the next level. 25" and 1100 Question - posted in Cats & Casses: Greetings all, long time lurker joining the fray! I wanted to ping the group for those who have handled and used both of the CPC 9. Neither is perfect. With the CPC mount the whole mount rotates with cables connected I did not like this when plugged into an off-mount power system. The LX90 mount/controller isn't in the same class. Ive seen Jan 18, 2007 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade vs. 10" f/10 Advanced Coma Free Optics - 2500mm focal length Ultra-High Transmission Coatings (UHTC) Includes a Apr 28, 2008 · Here's a review of the Celestron 9. 25. Regarding updates, I think Meade jumped way ahead with the LX-200ACF GPS and Celestron has been playing catchup. My questions is which on of the series of telescopes is the best? I looking at the 8 models in each of the series. So I am looking to modernize. Im teaching observational Astronomy at a community college here in California and just found out we had a Meade CPC1100 buried in a closet. I was happy enough Nov 21, 2018 · Page 1 of 2 - CPC 9. Celestron is a renowned name in the world of telescopes, known for its innovative and high-quality products. So, they are pretty comparable with the Meade 8” (only direct comparison) coming in lighter than the Celestron. May 30, 2010 · Page 2 of 2 - meade LX 200 vs celestron nexstar or CPC - posted in Cats & Casses: Carlos, My thoughts are that youve been listening to a lot of nonsense. 25” CPC - 64 pounds 10” LX200 – 65 pounds. Were I to opt for either one, it would unhesitatingly be the Celestron. I think is have it right when I am in the night sky but I dont and my frustration level is Feb 14, 2009 · Celestron CPC 800 vs Meade 8 LX 90 ACF - posted in Cats & Casses: Celestron CPC 800 or Meade 8 LX 90 ACF. May 20, 2014 · Meade 10" ACF LX90 --- $2150 Celestron 9. The LX-200 is pricier but comes with a giant bundle of extras. Celestron is famous for creating high-quality refractor telescopes for astronomical and terrestrial viewing. Dont ask me why but the shipping costs for the LX200 is much cheaper then for the LX90. org Mar 14, 2024 · Meade has no shortage of advanced telescopes for you to choose from. I considered the Meade LX90 series and Celestron CPC and CPC Deluxe series Feb 26, 2006 · Meade 12 LX90 LNT vs. How stable are CPC series comparing with LX200GPS series for astrophotography (long exposure Celestron vs Meade 8" Post by joeyttk » Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:01 pm. S I have a 12" LX 200 ACF that costed me almost 12K if not for the discount at that time. Nov 1, 2006 · LX200 GPS vs. And the optics of meade are not the most famous beeing now the chinese ones far better. My 8" Celestron has never had to be colliminated despite constant travel. I will be using it mainly in the backyard (suburbs of Chicago). 25 but am concerned about the weight at 58lbs. As of now I am torn between choosing a CPC 1100 GPS or a 10” LX200 GPS. I want a telescope which can grow with me for several years. Can any one offer some pros and con to the 2? thanks Steve. cheaper materials more plastic etc Just curious in the difference in pierce between the CPC800 and the Lx90 8 inch scope Now that I said that IF I WERE YOU (and I am not) Sep 9, 2019 · Meade LX65 203/2032 VS Celestron NexStar 8 SE il y a aussi le CPC 800 qui semble avoir les mêmes caractéristiques mais dispose d'une double fourche et d'une Mar 22, 2005 · The Meade is supplied with a 26mm Plossl eyepiece, 2” diagonal mirror and 9 x 50 finder scope. Here is why. 25 vs Meade LX90 10'' - posted in Cats & Casses: Looking at these 2, celestron with the cgx mount and the meade with the fork tripod mount. Also, the Celstron has heavier duty arms, bearings, gears. Dec 4, 2020 · Page 1 of 2 - ACF vs Edge HD, Which is better? - posted in Cats & Casses: I have saved up enough money that I want to purchase a schmitt-cassegrain. As Patrick stated, the design lets you carry it much more easily. 3. ), but the Meade might have slightly better optics. The Celestron is supplied with a 26mm Plossl, ¼ diagonal, and 8 x 50 finder. Meade 12'' RCX400, someday oh someday! Apr 24, 2011 · Page 1 of 2 - Portability of 8 vs. Jun 29, 2016 · What is the weight of a CPC 925, CPC 1100 & Lx-90 10" - posted in Cats & Casses: I made the mistake of refurbishing a 10Meade Lx200 which was donated to our college by a generous local ( I updated the drive electronics from the LX200 classic system to the George Dudash supplied audio star Upgrade system which works great & is recommended- Thanks George!). Another aspect to look at is ease of setup and use. Meade produces the 14" ACF in LX200 and LX600 configuration, the 14" is probably right on the limit of the LX200 platform. LX200 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi guys, I am currently deciding between an 8" Meade LX90 or LX200. Jul 1, 2020 · Page 2 of 2 - Cpc 1100 Edge vs Meade 12” AFC - posted in Cats & Casses: The main misinformation is what youre trying to provide. Celestron C8, C8+, Celestar 8 Deluxe, Powerstar 8 and Fastar 8. Celestron CPC 11 - posted in Cats & Casses: After months of looking at telescopes, I am down to the Meade LX90 10 or Celestron CPC 11, however it is difficult to determine the difference between these scopes. It has PPEC, which the Meade does not. Both mounts are good for visual use with the Celestron having a more sophisticated alignment routine. Reducer: vergiss ihn einfach. In fact the Celestron that i saw, included a case that cost almost as much as they as the current sales price. I know the bolt patterns are different between meade and celestron bases but Im sure this adaptation has been done many times. May 29, 2009 · 10 LX200 ACF vs. May 18, 2010 · I never owned a CPC 11 but i have owned a Nexstar 11 and i once owned a Meade 10" LX200. 25,Or just the C9. Mar 2, 2011 · What about the LX200? Mike. 10 LX200 Classic - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello all,Im a beginner-to-intermediate amateur astronomer, and Im planning to buy a general-purpose telescope for both visual observing and astrophotography. From the Celestron website: CPC: Re-designed drive base and drive mechanics - quiet operation Jul 12, 2007 · Meade LX90 10 vs. Ive narrowed it down to two companies: Meade and Celestron. Im conflicted between the two companies, most notably, the coma free optics both have. Its fine for visual, but a struggle for any long exposure photography. I had to choose between the 10" LX200 or the Nexstar 11 GPS, and I went Nexstar. The Celestron equivalent is the CPC. Jan 12, 2013 · Celestron to meade wedge adaptor needed - posted in Mounts: I have looked around and cant seem to locate any kind of diy mod or prefabed adaptor to allow a celestron base (older 90s era) to mount to a meade eqt. Dec 21, 2018 · bonjour, je crois que tu n'es pas trop loin du var. Or get the Meade LX200R. One thing is id like to be able to use the Stella with Meade 8” LX200 ACF – The 8” LX200 ACF’s improved hardware and software make it significantly better for astrophotography than the LX90 and the various Celestron fork-mounted 8” SCT configurations, but it is needlessly bulky for visual use and superior equatorial mounts are less expensive and more capable to purchase for holding one of May 12, 2008 · Meade LX200-ACF 10 or Celestron CPC 1100 GPS - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Im a new poster although I have been combing over the boards for months and reading everything that you have to say. Both scopes have the XLT coatings. Pro for Jul 14, 2019 · Page 1 of 3 - Celestron Edge HD vs Meade ACF [Optical Properties] - posted in Cats & Casses: How much of a difference is the Celestron Edge HD optical performance to the Meade ACF? Ive heard the saying Meade for Mak, Celestron for SCT, are the Celestrons much better? If they were the same aperture using the same eyepiece, would one notice a visual difference between the two? [Im not concerned Dec 19, 2021 · Nextar 8" Evolution HD Vs CPC 1100 XLT - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: After a year of fooling around with the setup I have, I am coming to terms with the fact that its not going to get me where I want to be. 25 and Meade Lx200 10"? Feb 18, 2019 · The LX200 is more comparable to the CPC series Celestron telescopes. Jul 18, 2009 · Celestron vs Meade - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hi im new to CN and I was wondering if you readers would be able to help me out. The large field tripod puts the rig at seriously large and heavy. 25 for so long, it has a purpose for Sep 7, 2011 · Meade LX-200 and Autostar-equipped robotic telescopes (such as the ETX 90/125 and LX200 GPS). Shop for catadioptric Orion, Meade and Celestron telescopes at High Point Scientific. C9. I have been in the wilderness without a telescope for over 6 months and I am now looking Oct 14, 2022 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade vs Celestron - posted in Cats & Casses: Does anyone know why Meade telescopes cost less than Celestron? Does Meade not include things like a visual back? Finderscope? Ive always been curious what the reasoning was. comments? What do you want to do with this telescope? The "higher rating" is because this is a more expensive, more imaging capable telescope. I get the Celestron is pretty big, but putting that aside for a moment, I am questioning the old technology. Real-world experienced users of ACF dont experience nearly the issues you claim. This site contains affiliate links to products. The LX200 is a different price point than the CPC. Apr 3, 2008 · CPC 9. 11” CPC – 70 pounds 12” LX200 – 75 pounds. From my reading, the optics seem equivalent. I know I do like the 11 and below Celestron Cats better then the Meades, but the 14 might have been large enough that Meade took a little more time with the optical Jun 6, 2005 · A Celestron technician said it was hogwash when people say the 9. Like the rest of you, I would love to have a 14" or even 16" scope on my pier, but Mar 20, 2006 · Meade 8 LX90 GPS Vs. Meade 2080, 8" LX2 through LX10 and Ultima 8. Get the CPC 1100. I have it narrowed down to the Meade and the Celestron GPS Jun 28, 2014 · Meade LX90 vs. Both scopes have superior optics. Im wondering if, aside from the optical tubes, there is an advantage of the CPC HD mount over the CPC mount. At first, it will only be used visually, but astrophotography is not excluded in the future. I only need to carry it out of my house about 20 feet. Ive learned enough at this stage to be humbled by Mar 14, 2009 · LX90 8-inch vs. Old Meade 2045 4" SCTs Old Meade MTS-SN6/ MTS-SN8 Schmidt Newtonians from the 1980s Old Celestron C-10 SCTs Celestron C90/G3 Meade ETX 90, 105, 125 (2+ or 3-) Celestron NexStar 4 Maksutov (2+) Category 3: Recommended ($1000-$3000) Meade LX10, LX50, LX200, LX90 Older Meade 2080, 2010 units (LX3, LX6, LX100) Dec 30, 2006 · Bonjour a tous je suis nouveau sur le forum et j'adore l'astronomie , j'ai donc décidé de fair l'aquisition d'un telescope j'hésite beaucoup entre un celestron 11cpc XLT ou un meade LX200 gps en 254 ou 305 pourriez vous me conseillé , lequel du meade ou du celestron et le meilleur , lequel a le meilleur optique . 9. There was some really useful insights in there. Im upgrading to a CPC. 25 inch GPS SCT vs Old(ish) Meade LX200 10” - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello, I’m in the market for a 9”-10” scope mainly for visual, but would eventually like to get into AP. Apr 22, 2010 · Celestron CPC800 vs Meade LX90ACF - posted in Cats & Casses: I think I have narrowed my telescope search to the Celestron CPC800 or the Meade LX90ACF. merci de vos reponse. Since I now had a mount that can support a larger SCT, my quest for the ultimate SCT was in motion. Ive read articles on both and some say that the Meade suffers from wind vibration and optical qualities vary and others say that the C11 is Sep 15, 2005 · LX200 vs. Plus at the time I bought it everyone said Celestron had the best tech Mar 17, 2012 · Meade LX vs Celestron CPC? - posted in Major & Minor Planetary Imaging: Hi! I own a Celestron 6SE and love planetary AP. 4. My camera is an SBIG ST2K XM, so small sensor. Will be using for visual use only, will either of these be visually better than a 8 sct edge or 8 meade lx200. Again, these are from each company’s website, not my measurements. . (Vixen Sphinx) I thought it looked pretty easy i watched a couple youtube videos and I thought I can do this, well guess what I really cant. November 2011; Geschlossen Thema ignorieren; Die LX-Polwiegen sind für die LX200-Gabeln gedacht, die Jan 19, 2020 · PERIOD. Feb 24, 2006 · 10 Meade LX200 GPS or Celestron CPC 1100 - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I am a 2 year etx-105 user and want to move up to a larger scope. Performance is similar on other size telescopes. CPC1100 ? - posted in Cats & Casses: Hey All!This is my first post here on CN so I hope Im doing this right. Both have a few quality control and customer service problems to work out. However, it seems like for around the same amount of $$$ I can get a 12 Meade LX90-SC. The CPC has a two-year warranty, versus Apr 16, 2014 · LX 200 12 vs. The 1" difference in aperture while not completely insignificant, isn't going to absolutely alter the results of visual observations. 25″ models, and the CPC fork mount for 11″ and 14″ SCTs. Has anyone here ever heard of a Meade board exploding? Sheesh! Meade and Celestron both make good commercial telescopes. Meade’s 8” LX200 and LX90 lines are the equivalent series of fork-mounted Schmidt-Cassegrains and have always been direct competitors. The 8'' Meade LX200-Classic: Easy to operate and did not give me one issue ever over the period of three years and so far the 12'' LX200 Classic is on the same path. Thanks This driver has been created after discovering that the "Meade LX200 Classic and Autostar #494, #495, and #497 (combined telescope/focuser, 5. The CPC 925 HD and 1100 HD were on my short list, but now, maybe not. Astrophotography, secondary. Nov 11, 2006 · Meade 12 LX200R or 11 Celestron CPC 11 - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Looking for advice on whether I should purchase a Meade 12 LX200R or a Celestron 11 CPC 11. Therefore Meade LX90GPS or Celestron CPC 800 is now the questionI definately decided to go for the biggest OTA i can afford and that is about an 8 which Apr 4, 2016 · The LX200 is a far better mount than the LX90, particularly if you are going up to the 12 inch. I have done a bit of research and from Jun 20, 2023 · CPC vs CPC HD Mounts - posted in Cats & Casses: Celestron states that both the CPC standard mount and the CPC HD mount have been improved. Current wedges for the Celestron SE, Evo, and CPC mounts use the same arrangement of three 3/8" bolts used to secure the mount to the wedge. I am only 1 year into this obsession previously known as a hobby but have got the fever something fierce!I had an 8 Celestron Newtonian on a CG5 mount and just HATED the darn thing to many SW bugs and lost hours re May 17, 2011 · The Meade does use worm gears btwBUT the Lx90 mount itself is not in the same class as the CPC or Meade LX200 mounts. Mannimanaste; 20. LX200 gelesen. cpc 11" Started by jjensen , Jul 08 2005 07:47 AM. The Nexstar 11 was actually lighter than the Meade 10" LX200 (i know the LX90 has lighter forks - i had an 8" once) and MUCH easier to handle. Also, you can put lithium batteries on the LX90 if you want, but will recharge externally. Jan 24, 2021 · For visual purposes I most probably go for the Meade 12”LX90 ACF as offers sharper optics and ACF (Advanced coma free) it’s not vital for visuel however I’ve found the optics are improved over the standard Celestron XLT line up of scopes unless you considered also the 9. Feb 12, 2009 · NexStar 8 SE vs CPC 800 GPS (XLT) vs LX 90 ACF 8 - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Does it make any difference for AP?What do you recommend, if I have to choose between these and why? Nov 8, 2006 · So, if you are in good shape the weight issues for either the Meade or Celestron should not be an issue. I had a CPC1100 a few years back and loved it. Should I consider this Meade scope as well? A good friend said comparing Celestron to Meade products are like comparing "apples to apples". The Meade can also Feb 22, 2023 · Celestron’s NexStar 8SE is considerably cheaper, however its mount is grossly undersized and shaky. I have two telescopes in mind; a very gently used Meade 10 LX200 GPS with UHTC coatings (asking price is $2400 with Millburn wedge) and a new Celestron 11 CPC1100 GPS with XLT May 26, 2019 · Celestron pretty much split off the C14 from it's fork program and hasn't considered a revisit leaving Meade to produce the more robust mounts for imaging/tracking. The CPC also comes with a 12v battery connector, and the Meade doesnt. To me, the scopes seem to have pretty similar features. Celestron CG-11 CGE 1100 CM-1100 EdgeHD 11 OTA Meade LX850 10" OTA. Discerning professionals in the astronomy field often choose Meade telescopes because of their high-end features, high-quality optics, and diverse options. Sep 25, 2007 · 1. The driver can be installed alongside any other driver (including the "universal" one Sep 7, 2005 · CPC925 vs 10 LX200GPS - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hello folks,Today I noticed that Celestrons recent CPC news updates and read some articles about CPC series. P. The required lifting weight of 65 lbs. Meade 8x50 finder scope, Orion 40mm and Celestron Aug 3, 2010 · Used 8 LX200 GPS Vs New Celestron 8SE or C8SGT - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): Thanks in advance for helping meNew to astronomy and want to slowly move to astrophotography. 25 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello,I am currently on the market for a new SCT. Celestron’s Evolution 8 is a cheaper telescope on a lighter but still plenty stable single-fork-arm mount. I also have had two Meade LX-75 goto mount that work great, still using one with my EON 120mm refractor on it and love it. 3) on Dec 8, 2006 · The Meade shows Saturn with an icy white coloring, the Celestron coloring is a little warmer. Meade provides the LX90, LX200, and LX600 mounts, while Celestron offers the Nexstar Evolution mount for 8″ and 9. Our clubs 12" LX200 in an observatory has had collimination every two to three years. 25 and 1100 models. Celestron Ultima 2000, Nexstar 5, Nexstar 8, Nexstar 11 GPS, NexStar CPC and Nexstar 114 GT telescopes (will not work with other Nexstar models). I would like to list what I have found and was wondering if anyone could give me more information. the 33 lbs 8” LX90 tube/fork package, though both telescopes use Meade’s Standard Field Tripod, weighing in at 19 lbs. Zumindest Meade und Celestron. The only problem for me is, which is better. With limited availability, I am also looking at the Meade 8 inch scopes and wondering how they compair Jan 10, 2007 · Actually though, I'd really really really consider a CPC or an LX anything over the RCX models!!! Read in the Meade forums: Stay away from RCX seems to be a big mantra over there. My budget will fit either one of this. I have lots of XP with a new C11 (I use it at work) and I LOVE the image quality. Nexstar - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): Hello, I am looking a SCT LX200 10 or Celestron Nexstar or CPC 11, I like know yours opinion on theses telescopes, defferences,portability, optics quality. Telescope Carrying Case for Celestron CPC 1100 GPS. 4)" driver listed below does not implement enough features to allow the telescope to be properly operated remotely. Being a newbie and not wishing to start a war, Im reluctant to post his question, but essentially when I have asked local clubs about their experience with Celstron SCTs, more often than not I get coments suggesting Apr 14, 2008 · Ich habe schon recht viel über den Vergleich LX90 vs. iisqr vpljaepe bdnvxnq nophus yhidsnl qllpx xjici lcvv fcariv nkjka