Better than shp9500. Nothing wrong with that.

Better than shp9500 May 2, 2021 · I have SHP9500, they are about 80$, they have 50mm drivers. Mar 6, 2007 · I would consider the Philips Fidelio l2 if I were you. I figured their signature would be similar but they would do better in the aspects where the SHP9500 lacks. Sep 11, 2021 · To actually get something comparable which is a bit better, The X2HR from Philips are great in many aspects. Other than gaming, I listen to 70’s rock, modern pop and some electronic as well. They're both plastic, but the HD6XX is better built. Probably at the top. While both pairs of open-back headphones have balanced sound profiles, the Fidelio X2HR have a more neutral sound. If both are the same price, it's a no brainer, go for the Fidelio. So I only suggest buying a DAC if you have the extra money or you just want to get better sound out of the SHP9500 without buying new headphones :-) Which headphones would be better for my tasks - listening, mixing and indoor mobility (only in apartment): k371, x2hr or shp9500? Is it worth getting the philips fidelio x2hr when there is the philips shp9500? Thanks for the answers! PS. HD700, I tried them sadly after I got sudden permanent hearing loss so I dont know how they sound. ) The Philips SHP9600 or X2HR would also be at least be a better fit than the SHP9500. com They're a lot wider, flatter (as in less random peaks, its still V shaped), have better imaging, much less siblance, and no real noticeable grain. I say, go with HD560S, better distortion, lighter and better comfort, better out of box FR and far cheaper. They're very light and comfortable. I wouldn’t recommend taking these puppies out because they will bother everyone around you + you’ll look like a nerd and will probably get stuffed in a trash can by your local bully. for extra info about me : ive tried the SHP9500's and they did sound great but they did not do a good job in footsteps when it came to games. Dec 14, 2024 · For the uninitiated, the SHP9500 is an open-backed headphone that will leak quite a bit of sound. Haven't tried the SHP 9500 on my O2 Amp yet. Comfort Aug 31, 2023 · Right away you’ll notice that the 9600 is more compact all around, with a slightly tighter clamp force that feels quite incredible on your head. The reviewer mentions that the detail in instrument representation is "tougher" as if that's not important. I can't in good conscience say the SHP9500 does even one thing better than the HD 558. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 is good for a slightly higher-end open-back option. And one of my most used headphones right now - in fact, it is my primary set of cans for most stuff these days due to a combination of incredible light weight, good Would I just be better off buying a EM6L for someone like me without amp/dac and looking for the qualities of wallhack territory competitive gaming sound while having fun and immersive music/movie experience. The SHP9600 have a sleeker, all-black design and leak less audio. The imaging doesn't sound as precise, but the wider soundstage makes subtle differences more spatially apparent. Aug 28, 2020 · Looking for a new pair of headphones to replace my shp9500s (open-back only). Its a tiny bass improvement. Both these headphones are minimal, chic, and convey a neutral sound to you. That is entirely up to how deep you want to get into this hobby. Joined Jul 21, 2018 Messages 17,913 Likes 41,301 Location South Holland. I use both and have been A/B testing them daily for about a month. From reading alot, they seem like little less wide HD800 with HD650 like distortion and very unpopular ear piercing harsh FR. See full list on soundgearauthority. I would avoid the 60e unless you plan on EQ’ing 2kHz down by about 9dB. Just in general you don’t want a rumbly bass in competitive gaming you would generally want the bass recessed with mids and highs being pushed to the front of the sound so Sep 25, 2020 · The Philips Fidelio X2HR are better headphones for neutral sound than the Philips SHP9600. The pads are better, they are also memory foam unlike the SHP 9500. Both headphones are great with a very good sound profile. solderdude Grand Contributor. Related: Open back vs. It does everything all those other headphones do, in most cases better. Both headphones have very balanced sound profiles that suit a wide range of music genres. There are not many affordable desktop USB DAC's as most of them will be more expensive than the Philips SHP9500 itself. I have the SHP 9500. No longer does the headphone feel like it’s going to slide off. See the review here. They're also better-built. Sound quality is very good for entry level headphones. (Though, I think it was around $115 recently. Fidelio X2 has a much bigger sound stage, and better imaging (although not great compared to other headphones, but those are much more expensive). I have both. They are $120. I actually was thinking of DT1990 (600$) or a Focal Clear (900$) Feb 2, 2021 · I believe you should purchase the SHP9500 without hesitation as it’s better than the other 3 and has fewer issues. Chrono at The Headphone Show says it has better bass extension/impact than the Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro - a headphone that is about 3x as expensive and is already known for having excellent bass extension for an open-back dynamic headphone. The SR850 has a really bright treble that’s likely to annoy you, but it does do really well with Gaming and Film without the need for EQ. It's a little bassier than the open-back options. Some listeners may prefer the extra boom and punch in the SHP9600's bass range. SHP9500 and X2HR both are open-back headphones. It’s my go to combination as well. They are the big brother of the SHP 9500's and has less harsh treble and better bass. The HD 558 is a better sounding, more comfortable, headphone. In terms of "detail" and "clarity" the SHP9500 have more detail and clarity if you're talking about how bright the treble is. The HiFiMan deliver audio more consistently via their planar magnetic drivers. Jun 21, 2023 · The HiFiMan Sundara 2020 are somewhat better for neutral sound than the Philips SHP9500. They also have significantly better build quality. I love balanced headphones, and really like the sound signature of my 9500s - most important for me is soundstage and Feb 12, 2008 · The successor to the SHP9500. Nov 20, 2021 · Miles better than shp9500’s tested out of a magnius modius stack, a thx 789 paired with a topping D50, and a PA2V2 with a couple of different phones… not sure where you’re getting boxiness on the soundstage either… these things are obscenely wide and deep. Feb 9, 2021 · Today we’re going to talk about Philips SHP9500 vs X2HR with reviews and overall features. The Fidelio X2HR have a sleeker and more premium design, and they look and feel a bit more durable. Maybe you will find the HD600 is indeed much better than the SHP9500, but not necessarily $200 better. They exhibit better bass extension and a smoother treble response. So, barely over budget. Jan 10, 2021 · These have been on my list of possible headphones to buy, reason being that I have the philips SHP9500 (~ $80) and I consider them some of the best sounding cans I have. If I hadn't got the Beyer DT990's I'd still be using them. Closed back headphones. The 9500s has a more wide open, airy sound that works better for some music than the Fidelios, otherwise, the l2s are better in every regard. Some people pay thousands of dollars to take baby steps forward, others won't pay $20. If you're looking for a clear upgrade over the SHP9500 I don't think the M220/K240 is better than the SHP9500, just different. How much that extra step is worth to people here varies a lot. Nothing wrong with that. Jan 11, 2015 · the SHP 9000 spec is better than SHP9500 and they costed only Rs 3500 apprx, but long discontinued, where did you get your SHP9500 and for how much, I moved on to AKG K712, resolution leaves Philips behind but can be too much for less well recorded/mastered music Robert Bose The sound is not as airy as the SHP9500 and I think the SHP9500 might have a punchier low end, but I enjoy both. Either way, if you want something 'better' than the Cloud II without breaking bank, the Takstar Pro82 - and upgrade to the original Pro80, is a very, VERY good option under $100. K701 has 45mm drivers, MSRP is 400$ but it's for sell at 200$ Why is K701 200$, and SHP9500 80$? Does K701 allow me to hear things better than SHP9500? Or is it just an EQ curve? Jumping the price a bit. I recently bought the X2HR but its not worth $50 more. I mostly use them for gaming, currently connected to a v-moda mic, no amp/dac (don’t want to get one either). Jan 6, 2022 The Philips SHP9600 are very similar performing open-back headphones to the Philips SHP9500. Jun 7, 2020 · In most cases imo x2 hr is better than a shp9500 but in comparison the shp9500 is more neutral with a sharper and detailed high end which is very useful in competitives. I like them a little better than my old Sennheiser HD555's. The Philips SHP9500 and the Philips Fidelio X2HR are both great open-back headphones for neutral sound listening. The HD600 feels ever so slightly heavier and maybe more substantial, but Philips just knows who to make nice things and the SHP9500 just really looks like a nice thing - more expensive looking than its sub-$100 price tag would have you believe. It’s also a tad smaller and less bulky than the 9500. Mar 30, 2021 · All in the throes of choosing shp9500 / 9600 / x2xr). Jul 9, 2020 · 3. There's nothing that the 9600s do better than either of these. The Fidelio X2 is a more enjoyable headphone in every way compared to the SHP9500. 00 on Groupon right now and have been going down to $100 Jul 16, 2001 · Yes on SHP9500 and modmic. I read a lot about all these headphones and I know about Harman curve, which the k371 already possesses by HD6XX are more solidly built and will likely last you a very long time, compared to the cheap plastic feel of the SHP9500. The Superlux HD681 becomes a good option now. ylvvutv awtply xuv flvemw mwuh mihikk dvvdegn wshx ycqtc qhcziub zrxjz tnhkzkxi pfjf baml xpy