Truenas scale vs core performance. 12 is Linux, epool, and io_uring.

Truenas scale vs core performance Hello, I’m on the latest TrueNAS Core 13 with an 8 spinning-disk RAID-Z2 setup with an encrypted dataset - currently getting 535MB/s read performance. Whereas TrueNAS Core uses the older FreeBSD Bhyve (pronounced as beehive) and runs jails via IOCage, TrueNAS Scale has a KVM-based hypervisor and, as such, supports both Docker and Kubernetes Core release 13 has had nice performance for me. c. 02 (I know free ESXi is dead now, really sucks) | TrueNAS CORE and/or SCALE (generally the current version) on a 16GB Virtual Drive | 1 CPU Core / 2 Hyperthreads | 16GB RAM | Two 4TB NVMe drives as I just received approval for what is likely to be a ridiculous project. https://lawrence. that by default Scale only uses half of the memory by default for ARC but that I personally prefer the jail's in FreeBSD (Core) but Scale just has everything I need, it likely won't be as stable, or efficient just yet, but for homelab use scale seems totally fine, and will likely be the better decision for down the road when the stability and performance are up to scratch. (i. There I am working on testing everything I need out of plex on Scale and once I figure out the PCIE Nvidia transcoding I plan on moving on from Core to Scale. Share Sort by: Best. I have two old Dell Precision T3600s. While TrueNAS Scale worked reasonably well, I found that once I established my settings, I In this article, we’re going to look at TrueNAS Scale vs. video/truenasTrueNAS Core VS TrueNAS Scale 2024 forum posthttps://forums. This setup could simplify the storage architecture since it was designed to run as a VM. With the release of TrueNAS SCALE 24. For recommendations on the right Edition for you based on software When comparing performance between TrueNAS CORE and SCALE, there are different things to consider, including what you intend to run on both. I have a 10GBe network and is having an Intel X520-DA adapter on my TrueNas Scale. 03 VS TrueNAS Scale 22. 2 at the moment, but I have also tried SCALE TrueNAS SCALE 23. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 @ 3. So a 6 core with a base clock of 5Ghz will be superior for single client performance vs 16 cores running at 2. Get existing machine up and running. e. 10 For a personal computer (Unix) I have to decide between mirroring 2 SSDs or RAIDz1 3 SSDs. I am running TrueNAS Core 13U5. I got tired of shit breaking due to random changes in Scale or Core IE True charts. As in you use it as it is shipped and cannot add\remove packages. Unraid: Ecosystem and Community Support. Hardware: Supermicro X10SDV-TLN4F (Quad core Xeon-d, Dual Intel 10Gb Nics etc) Just wondering what the current state of (external) bridging is -- in terms of expectable performance -- on TrueNAS Core and Scale. 1 using When comparing performance between TrueNAS CORE and SCALE, it’s crucial to consider your specific use case and requirements. Download the SCALE 24. Watch this video on YouTube. There are two releases of TrueNAS to be aware of: TrueNAS SCALE and TrueNAS Core. At the moment I'm inclined to use TrueNAS Scale or Core? TrueNAS. 70GHz, featuring approximately 100TB of storage. Is core still the best option for a pure NAS? (FreeBSD) is the stability, and in some cases performance, if you dont run into hardware compatibility issues. Option 2 does seem like it'd more efficiently use my system's resources for things wouldn't have to worry about setting the proper balance between ZFS cache and RAM for docker services, but I'm cautious for a few Would you recommend Unraid or TrueNAS Scale? Im tending towards Unraid for the ease of use, but the slow write speeds upset me. lawrencesystems. Jail support is super basic. Speed differences Core vs Scale General I know that Core is much faster in performance but i did some testing on a 1 gigabit connection. Thread starter JMOR; Start date Dec 15, 2020; JMOR Cadet. It's also not that one is faster only it depends on the specific case. . Both platforms offer good performance, but TrueNAS SCALE may have Meanwhile, TrueNAS Scale is the new Debian-based OS that packs more advanced features than Core. However, as the Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. New posts Search forums Blog Forum Rules TrueNAS Community (free) 8. It has had many years of performance tuning and tweaks for enterprise. The battle was Proxmox VS TrueNAS Scale. 10 and my Plex performance went kablooie: All sorts of “non-local network” messages, especially for Plex managed-users; couldn’t get subtitles to work at all; and the Plex apps (running on SHIELDs) often needed several attempts just to see the contents of my libraries. A strong competitor in the enterprise sector, the enterprise-focused TrueNAS SCALE also offers extra capabilities, including scale-out storage and clustering. The current spec requirements for the node are a 4 core 8 thread CPU, 32GB of ram, and 440GB SSD storage. The maturity of TrueNAS 13. Both OS's are running OpenZFS 2. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS SCALE iperf3 between TrueNAS 40Gb (SAMBA) interface and linux VM on xcp-ng hits 8Gbps iperf3 between TrueNAS 40Gb (SAMBA) interface and Windows VM on xcp-ng hits 9. TrueNAS Scale for beginners: https: TrueNAS scale does not use its own custom containerization solution. Scale is still relatively fresh. It’s also the variant that iXsystems intends to divert all their attention to in the near Benchmarks: TrueNAS CORE 12 & 13 vs TrueNAS SCALE. I've settled for TrueNAS Scale and it came down to "Do I need reliable storage or a hypervisor?". 1 using It has been just over a year since I did the comparison of core vs scale on a R730xd with 1tb ram and dual mellanox 25gb cards 20 sas ssd and 4 optane to force sync=always. 04-BETA1 64GB RAM 10th Generation Intel i7 Samsung NVME SSD 1TB, QVO SSD 1TB Boot from Samsung Portable T7 SSD USBC If you want to run a datastore from ESXi boot HDD you would see very bad write performance on write-cache-less controller. Core is FreeBSD-based. that by default Scale only uses half Greetings, I am presently operating TrueNAS 13 on an Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2. 0-U8; Show : Dell T20. 3) 3. 0. Lawrence Systems comparing TN SCALE performance vs. Any help would be appreciated. but I wouldn't personally contemplate using it for TrueNAS (Core or SCALE) lack of BSD/Unix support, no ECC, plus the power consumption] Show : Main NAS : I recently upgraded from CORE to SCALE 24. TrueNAS SCALE Beta vs TrueNAS CORE Performance Comparison . TrueNAS Core: The Foundation of I am currently running the latest release of Truenas Scale (22. TrueNAS SCALE 23. Truenas Core vs Truenas Scale The difference between the two is Core main function file sharing and some jails for extra services. Scale's performance is fine for home users, but when we're going at the speeds you want, core all the way. Then look at potentially migrating from Core to Scale. ryzen 5900x handles things fine. video/truenashttps://openbenchmarking. Resources. 10, there’s never been a better time to join the growing TrueNAS community. That‘s why i needed to understand how sync writes work and how it impacts the whole process. It operates on the FreeBSD operating system, which is known for its robustness and performance in network environments. Yes, RAIDz1 has to compute the parity info for the third disk. It topped out at around 3Gbit/s both reads and This is a Intel Core i7 920 @ 3. Oh, and, I think, better FreeBSD/TrueNAS Core compatibility, which is probably where this obsession with them originated in the first place. 02. Besides OpenMediaVault , Unraid is more-or-less TrueNAS Scale’s only rival. com/t/truenas-core-vs-truenas-scale-2024/20314The F TrueNAS SCALE vs TrueNAS Core – Virtualization. "TrueNAS Scale NVME Performance Scaling" Similar threads NVME Performance Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. If there was the same user friendly interface for building a stack of containers as it is done with the NAS setup and with the way Portainer does it when working with Compose, then it would be ideal. 2 lands in Core, I'll see if using TrueNAS CORE TrueNAS SCALE TrueCommand. 2 (Cobia) Chassis: Norco RPC-4224 (4U 24 Bay with quiet fan/airflow modifications) Motherboard: Supermicro X10SRi-F (UP, IPMI, 10 SATA3, 6 PCIe3, 1TB RAM limit) CPU: Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 E5-2699A v4 (22 cores/44threads 2. Performance wise it’s pretty much on par with Linux, at least for storage and The following benchmark values will only give you the performance of a single CPU core/thread. Thread starter KingKaido; Start date Oct 23, 2022; 1; 2; 3; Next. Performance stayed the same. Get app Iscisi has better performance on Core but in reality scale is the way to go. CapitalJD June 25, On paper, TrueNAS Scale doesn’t require a demanding system, as any 64-bit processor would suffice. You have to buy much more drives in a RaidZ vs regular Raid5 for the same capacity, in order to have good performance. The performance of these two NAS operating systems is highly dependent on the use-case scenario. Super stable, rock solid. I remember that in the past TrueNAS was based TrueNAS Core 13. That's why I did a speed test and was a bit shocked by the slow performance of Share. I basically converted my previous main system to truenas. 0, and TrueNAS SCALE 22. Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. Below is the hardware/setup and then my issue. The focus of TrueNAS CORE continues to be sustaining storage reliability and security for existing users. atom5ive; Oct 20, 2023; TrueNAS SCALE Bluefin; Replies 6 Views 2K. They work great as file resource servers whether as NFS, SMB or iSCSI. 6Ghz) Cooler: Noctua NH-U9DX i4 (2 x Noctua 90mm NF-B9 PWM fans) PSU: Corsair Pools imported fine Really nice with this possibility to switch between CORE and SCALE (would be even easier if I had saved my old CORE config :P) EDIT: had to go to commandline and change pool-wide ACL type (had created the pools in SCALE, so default was posix, even with some datasets set to nfsv4) to nfsv4, otherwise I got some ACL errors from TrueNAS CORE TrueNAS SCALE TrueCommand. Very high entry threshold compared to Docker and Docker Compose. However, most of the performance improvements seem to be in the OpenZFS and protocol stacks not the underlying OS. The testing I have seen from scale to core is that core https://lawrence. There are actually two different versions of TrueNAS: TrueNAS Core and TrueNAS Scale. Reply reply m7samuel • Scale is comparable to Proxmox. 0 has performance improvements from 12. TL;DR I was able to get almost 4GB/s throughput to a single VMware VM using Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. What I am looking for here is a detailed and technical conversation about the read performance https://lawrence. 0-U5. it uses the same thing every other Linux container solution uses at the end of the day. We have done some fairly heavy modifications to it (using a kevent-based event backend in Samba and FreeBSD kernel AIO). i think a youtuber OMV vs UnRain vs TrueNas (Core or Scale), TrueNAS SCALE Supermicro X10SDV-4C-TLN4F mainboard Supermicro SCE300 chassis Intel Xeon D-1518 TrueNAS CORE Supermicro 5028D-TN4T barebone Intel Xeon D-1541 - 8 cores @victor1597 have you noticed any difference in Nextcloud's performance, between scripted installation in jail and Scale's app? TrueNAS-13. Join the Growing SCALE Community. DDR4 256 GB If you're using it mainly as a media server, the performance of zfs won't be that important for you, and as others have said, zfs is the big thing that differentiates TrueNAS. Alder Lake / Raptor Lake Build Advice | P Core only CPU vs P+E Core CPU | TrueNAS Scale Angelfish vs Bluefin | MW34-SP0 W680 Motherboard. In reading various forum discussions and concerns, was wondering what the current perspective would be on the following 2 questions: 1. 5gbe ports actively bridged, 64gb ddr4 ram, and 5x8tb raidz2 in truenas scale, no issues overall. The hardware is different obviously but is it typical for TrueNAS to have superior Plex performance? or am I just seeing the difference in hardware? I didn't try Scale or Core 12. Supermicro X10SL7-F Xeon E3-1245 v3 32GB RAM ECC LSI 2308 (on board), IT mode (passthrough to TrueNAS) 4x2TB, ProxMox + Linux Containers for Sonarr,radarr, plex etc and then a Virtual TrueNas Core handling just storage. All of this was smooth as butter under CORE I'm going to use TrueNAS Core to set up my home NAS server, and I have some questions about ZFS configuration. 04-BETA1 MB: ASUS P10S-I Series RAM: 32 GB CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) For scaling up density, I‘ve virtualized over 80 Windows gaming VMs on TrueNAS Core by utilizing CPU/RAM resource pools and delegating GPU pass-through with VT-d support. I even tried installing TrueNas Core bare metal with the full resources of the server, but to no avail. I currenlty have a 9900k on a z390 master board, 64gb ram, 6 TrueNAS 13. I also tested the SMB share and it's faster(?) than the iSCSI share. 17. As long as your VM has more than a single core, I consider performance in this workload “almost a tie” – the Hello, I have been using TrueNAS CORE (TrueNAS-13. com for thread: "Core vs Scale Snapshot Problems" Similar threads Setting up Periodic Snapshots for VMs in TrueNAS SCALE. Reply reply EmoJackson I think it's pretty good for performance vs power consumption. Using iscsi we got almost 30% improvement on core vs Performance-wise SCALE is almost on par with CORE, it depends on the use case. My requirement is to run Fibre Channel as a backup to 10GiB Ethernet. truenas. 0-U6. That sucks. SCALE has matured rapidly and offers a more robust app environment based on Linux Hi, I am building a new AIO VMWare Host which currently is running ESXi 8 U2. In my eyes there is not much different 112mb is max that i can get. x, SCALE will receive improvements as it matures in its development Previously I heard that iscsi performance on scale was worse than that of core. 2. Oct 21, 2023. Proxmox to determine the differences between both operating systems. Help I need a bit of advice for choosing the right hypervisor and guest OSs for a cluster setup. com/t/truenas-core-vs-truenas-scale-feb-15-2023-speed-test/16755How T TrueNAS CORE vs TrueNAS SCALE | TX401 | 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Adapter I ended up switching from scale back to core for the aforementioned performance issues. I think Well you're comparing a 10+ years battle tested platform Core vs. Before we get started, both, TrueNAS Scale and Proxmox can perform similar functions, Hi All, I thought I would post a quick “how-to” for those interested in getting better performance out of TrueNAS Scale for iSCSI workloads. Understanding VM CPU settings. Note the following high-level comparison between TrueNAS SCALE and TrueNAS Those performance tools you're using aren't really measuring anything of value other than single client performance. Report TrueNAS Bug Report TrueCommand Bug How To Make a Good Bug Report. 12. I just pass my HBA directly to the VM of Core and everything has been super stable and much more consistent performance. However, you’ll need a minimum of 8GB RAM to run the OS without performance issues, meaning However, since TrueNAS Scale is in the process to get a final version in a week and a half and uses KVM for the VMs just like Proxmox, the question arises: is it worth to run TrueNAS Scale as the base OS instead of Proxmox? TrueNAS SCALE changes this around by making OpenZFS the default file system and supporting it via APIs and WebUI. 8Gbps So, network-wise, xcp-ng, truenas, and TrueNAS Core vs TrueNAS Scale . And OP core has better performance period. 02 (I know free ESXi is dead now, really sucks) | TrueNAS CORE and/or SCALE (generally the current version) on a Both CORE and SCALE are an appliance OS. Both are equally good. TrueNAS Core has been available since 2005 (formerly Unless someone can prove I'm wrong, Scale isn't there yet, speaking of i/o performance compared to Core. Attempting to activate or roll back to a CORE boot environment can break the system. Joined Dec 15, 2020 Messages 2. CapitalJD June 23, 2023, 10:41pm 1. 0 is not yet as high as TrueNAS SCALE Beta vs TrueNAS CORE Performance Comparison Before doing an in place upgrade I had the system configured as a storage target for XCP-NG with both NFS and iSCSI. I can bring the number of efficiency cores down to 0, but the minimum number of performance cores that can be set is 1. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS SCALE TrueNAS SCALE vs CORE. 0-U4) for some time as a file server and I am very happy with it. Scale is being introduced to start bringing forward the ability for easier hypervisor VM’s and docker containers. 4 VM that requires a minimum system spec to operate. tl;dr appears to be that SCALE performs abysmally in random writes: Benchmarks: TrueNAS So, today I decided to convert my running Truenas Core NAS to Scale and although the process has happened smoothly and everything is up and running the Performance is dire Its Current CORE vs SCALE as indicated, we expect CORE 13. Yes there are lots of things fixed in fact if you used Scale release from May/2022, So your experience can vary extremely between two TrueNAS CORE TrueNAS SCALE TrueCommand. This doesn't make any sense to me. update from FreeNAS 11. For my 2 core systems, its a walk in the park setting up the fibre. Installed everything as always, set up NFS, mounted my Share (nfs4) and tried moving a VM to it. 3 Current TrueNAS CORE users can elect to remain on CORE or upgrade to Electric Eel. 2. 20GHz with AES-NI support; 20 GByte RAM (4 GByte ECC) Performance; Replies 6 Views 5K. I ran series of FIO benchmarks using Phoronix, did the in place upgrade, then ran the same benchmarks again. Report a Bug. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS SCALE 24. As 13. the point is that CORE and SCALE will show different measurements. TrueNAS CORE 12. 04. I am contemplating a transition towards a hybrid model, with 10-20TB of local storage for recent downloads, supplemented by rclone's unlimited Google Drive Intel® Core™ i3-13100TE Processor (12M Cache, up to 4. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS The current TrueNAS scale version definitely has an SMB read problem! I've had stable 108 MB/s reading and writing for years (Core and Scale). Is After I swapped back to TrueNAS Scale- with a single processor, Apparently, TrueNAS Scale suffers possible memory performance penalties on single core virtual machines. Z. However, it is still in beta, and while it is pretty solid for home use, it is not yet tuned for performance compared to TN CORE. 32,172. Scale seems better for pretty much anything else, though. 11, and Scale uses Samba version 4. 22. Related topics on forums. TrueNAS CORE test system: CASE: Old Silverstone HTPC case MB: ASUS x-99M WS CPU: Xeon E5-2620v4 + Corsair H60 Cooler block RAM: CRUCIAL 32GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMMs HDD: WD RED 8TBx3 OS: 1 x Kingston UV400 120GB SSD - boot drive PSU: Corsair RM1000 Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. org/result/2205201-NE-TRUENASCO23Connecting With Us----- TrueNAS is an operating system based on the OpenZFS file system. If you run it on bare metal I would recommend running scale in order to get docker support and extend capabilities. If TrueNAS CORE 13. If stability, not power, is your goal then go with Core. 0 iSCSI / NFS / SMB Performance 2023 General Share Add a Comment. It is using Debian Linux and so there are drivers for newer chips and NICs. In the Scale system, its Both TrueNAS CORE and SCALE systems are actually nicely packaged graphical interfaces for managing and sharing storage space with users. Supermicro X10SL7-F Xeon E3-1245 v3 32GB RAM ECC LSI 2308 (on board), IT mode (passthrough to TrueNAS) 4x2TB, Synology DSM 7 vs TrueNAS Core - Software Comparison Choosing between these two incredibly popular platforms for secure storage, accessing and sharing your data is not easy! Though who demand TrueNAS scale does not use its own custom containerization solution. Forums. Reply reply TrueNAS core or scale is for storage and Proxmox as Hypervisor where I prefer XCP-NG. Hot take; scale is rubbish in performance, but people in this The advent of TrueNAS Core and TrueNAS Scale marks a paradigm shift in the storage landscape, providing a compelling blend of affordability, flexibility, and performance. This filesystem is 99% full, so everything is probably fragmented as hell and a lot slower than it could be, but it does give an idea of . Apr 5, 2015. org/result/2205201-NE-TRUENASCO23Connecting With Us----- TrueNas Scale in general and TrueCharts in particular have one big problem. 3 is Planned for Q2 TrueNAS SCALE is the software edition where forward-looking development takes place. 32 -s /mnt/tank7/nfs -v tn15_nfs I've been testing out different app images of sabnzbd/sonarr/radarr and I'm finding performance differences when using the Truecharts 3rd party app catalog vs just launching a docker container from Docker hub such as linuxserver/sabnzbd. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Y. See more TrueNAS Open Storage is a universal data platform with three Editions to choose from: CORE, Enterprise, and SCALE. 10 GHz) quick reference with specifications, features, and technologies. ESXi (free) 8. I’ve been wondering about updating to SCALE but I heard that SCALE has bad encryption performance (something to do with encryption being single-threaded inside the kernel) compared to CORE. f. To be able to run a couple VM's directly on your NAS, great, but also then I think, if something goes Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. For performance with a minimal amount of loss Jails are king. Then, we’ll take a look at the major differences between TrueNAS Core vs Scale to help you make an informed decision. But first Lawrence, I'm sorry to bug you randomly, but a long while back, you did a fantastic comparison video of TrueNAS core vs scale and you clearly showed, some performance issues with SCALE at the time. Performance: RAIDz1 vs mirroring. The difference between the two is Core main function file sharing and some jails for extra services. I have a particularly Good morning! To start with, I do not want this thread to turn into some kind of hunt for a quick fix to my performance problems. Benchmarks: TrueNAS CORE 12 & 13 vs TrueNAS SCALE Lawrence Systems recently published a performance-focused video with benchmarks of TrueNAS CORE 12-U8. The main purpose of TrueNAS, imo is to do a good job at being a NAS, so I'll stay on Core until it gets closer to Scale. Replication Errors. 04-BETA1 64GB RAM 10th Generation Intel i7 Samsung NVME SSD 1TB, QVO SSD 1TB Boot from Samsung Portable T7 SSD USBC CASE: Fractal Define 7 running TrueNAS SCALE 24. atom5ive. esxcli storage nfs41 add -H 172. If the data back up works between the servers, I could configure the HDDs in striped for better performance. 15. I share my plex with a bunch of people and I have a ton of movies and TV series that I really dont want to loose where i have watched till. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running The cost of ownership is very high (due to the fact that performance degrades drastically when loading the pool with more than 50%). Performance has now exceeded 13. For those curious what I base my advice on, I run one unraid server, one truenas I tried disabling performance cores, just for science, but there is not such options. > The only thing I can see that's different is that Core uses Samba version 4. Linux is more extensible vs bsd but core still pretty neat Reply reply More replies More replies. TrueNAS Scale instead scales out, clustering Docker game containers across nodes. 1 using Flexible IO. Before comparing both TrueNAS Core or Scale, we’ll take a look at exactly what TrueNAS Core and Scale are. Do I did move homeassistant, nextcloud, jellyfin and some other smaller things off of truenas and to a proxmox instance running on a old office PC, when i switched back, but core seems to be just that much more polished, while scale is theoretically better in every way, but at the end of the day any performance benefit i got from using it was eaten up by the bugs and issues that scale has. So I figured on this new system I can test both before deploying it as a replacement. 1 Like. Performance Comparison: Unraid and TrueNAS. You can see single disk performance is comparable both on bare metal and virtualized, 6x stripe testing is 6x faster than single-disk, and raidz2 performance is comparable between bare metal and virtualized w/ block-device passthru, but raidz2 performance is about 75% faster when TrueNAS CORE TrueNAS SCALE TrueCommand. All things related to TrueNAS, the world's #1 most deployed Storage OS! Skip to main content. On the same machine, scrub performance on TrueNAS core appears ~25% faster than TrueNAS Scale. 4-3. But, CPU times (for > The only thing I can see that's different is that Core uses Samba version 4. Docker has to be set up in a VM which requires a dedicated amount of CPU and RAM to be given to a VM. Once new features and components are tested and validated there, some are eligible for backporting to TrueNAS CORE. CORE will no longer be getting feature updates. 1, TrueNAS CORE 13. Linux cgroups, namespaces and change root. Before doing an in place upgrade I had the system configured as a storage target for XCP-NG with both NFS and iSCSI. As an option, OP can consider integrating solutions like Starwinds VSAN for HA storage for 2 nodes. ZiggyGT; Nov 6, 2022; Operation and Performance; Replies 2 Views 2K. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS NAS Performance Testing with RealTek 8111 NICs vs. You're already going to get over 100MB/s out of unRAID in most cases, which is more than enough for multiple video streams. I bought dedicated hardware on which TrueNAS CORE has been installed, I realised that it is vastly underused in terms of performance. 16. 04-BETA1 MB: ASUS P10S-I Series RAM: 32 GB CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) While Core is a well defined product, Scale allows for greater customization and compatibility with a wide array of solutions to be incorporated within the NAS. Open comment sort options Proxmox + Truenas Scale poor network performance upvote TrueNAS CORE TrueNAS SCALE TrueCommand. I'm fiddling with TrueNAS Scale and Core but thinking about OMV. The background is that a very large customer is paying us "stupid" money to quickly process and archive a 300TB+ proprietary database that requires a lot Migrating TrueNAS from CORE to SCALE is a one-way operation. OS: TrueNAS-SCALE-22. However, if SCALE underperforms CORE significantly, we should treat that as a bug and check why. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS longtime truenas/freenas user here, was excited to move to scale due to the underlying linux platform vs freebsd (and therefore the ability to use docker containers and a more traditional VM platform) while it has been mostly Build Report OS: TrueNAS SCALE 23. Help What option is better or more lightweight, TrueNAS Scale running in a proxmox VM or TrueNAS Core running in a proxmox VM ? Also, is it a very bad idea to run TrueNAS inside Proxmox? Thx in advance. While testing it I noticed the performance on plex was noticeably better on TrueNAS vs my current Plex server. TrueNAS Scale - 7x20TB WD Red HDD RAIDZ2 & 3x1TB WD Blue SSD RAIDZ BACKUP: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4F+ , 2x Intel Xeon E5-2680v2, 96GB ECC RAM, 2U 12 Bay SuperMicro Case, 2x 10GBase-T ports via Intel X550T2BLK This one simple change made the biggest difference for my NAS performance. 8Ghz, 12GB RAM, LSI MR 9260-8i with 8x 4TB in RAID5. 8Ghz each. Out of interest to the community would iX share the percentage of their Enterprise customers that currently use CORE vs SCALE? Feel free to like this post if you’d be interested in an answer. 6TB SSD in 3 * mirrored pairs + Optane 900P as SLOG AppPool 2 * 512GB Intel DC S3610 as mirrored pair TrueNAS CORE test system: CASE: Old Silverstone HTPC case MB: ASUS x-99M WS CPU: Xeon E5-2620v4 + Corsair H60 Cooler block RAM: CRUCIAL 32GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMMs HDD: WD RED 8TBx3 OS: 1 x Kingston UV400 120GB SSD - boot drive PSU: Corsair RM1000 Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. I’m going to migrate from Unraid to TrueNAS because I no longer need the VM or Docker support of Unraid. 1 of 3 Go to TrueNAS SCALE is becoming a more compelling option, as it builds on the solid TrueNAS middleware for storage, while providing more mature options for VMs and containers. 12 is Linux, epool, and io_uring. Sort by: Like he says, the actual performance will vary a lot depending on the use case. 02 (I know free ESXi is dead now, really sucks) | TrueNAS CORE and/or SCALE (generally the current version) on Truenas Core vs Truenas Scale So, would Truenas benefit from higher single threaded performance or should I go with higher overall performance? Are you already getting the speed you expect from your disks? If you don't max out the CPU in a network transfer (SMB is poorly threaded) then even a top spec Epyc CPU will have zero speed increase to TrueNas. If your use-case involves non-critical storage applications and Truenas Core vs Truenas Scale I have been using TrueNAS for some time and I would like your help with the following findings. Upgrade your CORE system to the latest publicly-available version, But besides TrueNAS Core and Scale, Unraid is another OS that’s preferred by many NAS builders. The power consumption and performance of SCALE seems to be very similar to CORE. TrueNAS TrueNAS Dragonfish I've been testing performance on the latest versions of TrueNAS Scale and Core and wanted to report a surprising result. Scale is not running the latest ixgbe driver from Intel but I guess it is tuned for its use. I suspect it was 18 to 24 I run core for 12 years (freenas became truenas core over time). 3 NextCloud: Docker image Pi-Hole: Uploaded docker image, not the official charts version NGINX Proxy Manager: Running on separate Hassio image CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G RAM: 32GB 3200 Proxmox vs TrueNAS CORE vs TrueNAS SCALE - Help needed with choosing the hypervisor and guests . TrueNAS Scale (Lab): 2xE5-2640 v3 @ 2. Software Status Latest reviews Search resources. Since the last two updates, READ performance has dropped by 30%. 04-BETA1 64GB RAM 10th Generation Intel i7 Samsung NVME SSD 1TB, QVO SSD 1TB Boot from Samsung Portable T7 TrueNAS CORE test system: CASE: Old Silverstone HTPC case MB: ASUS x-99M WS CPU: Xeon E5-2620v4 + Corsair H60 Cooler block RAM: CRUCIAL 32GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMMs HDD: WD RED 8TBx3 OS: 1 x Kingston UV400 120GB SSD - boot drive PSU: Corsair RM1000 Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. Yes you have to fight with BSD more than Linux but if you have even a 10g LAN you'll notice the difference in raw performance and like mentioned, stability. If you want to max out your potential performance you should have the same number of hard drives in the zpool or UFS raid as you do cores. 4 Benchmarks: TrueNAS CORE 12 & 13 vs TrueNAS SCALE. 1 System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2 CPU: Intel Xeon E-2314 Processor The performance loss is due to the fact that if you have an 11 drive RAIDZ3, TrueNAS CORE TrueNAS SCALE TrueCommand. Hello Everyone, I wanted to bring up this topic, as I just started running Scale and have two Core NAS servers in production. TrueNAS vs. I am trying to figure out where I'm going wrong that is causing loss in performance. iX. (Once OpenZFS 2. Careers. Upgrade to current stable version of CORE. 10. r/truenas A chip A close button. TrueNAS SCALE has inherited the storage functionality and automated testing from CORE. It's basically the same as TrueNAS Core but based on Debian instead of FreeBSD and with much better VM/Docker support. General rule of thumb is that if you want to optimize for maximum single client performance, less cores and higher clock is the way to go (Client and server both). Personally I transitioned from Core to Scale primarily for the linux backend to handle some 'special' projects. Stability-wise CORE is more polished and there are tons of that makes it easy to add-on other functions, like TrueNAS SCALE, and even CORE. I ran a scrub on "terapool", status below. 0-U1, which has been released, will have security and performance improvements that should have a positive impact on both CORE and Enterprise systems. CORE is based on FreeBSD and SCALE is based on Debian. Hi All, So, today I decided to convert my running Truenas Core NAS to Scale and although the process has happened smoothly and everything is up and running the Performance is dire compared to what I had with Core. I am running Flux node software within a Ubuntu Server 20. The hardware configuration I'm currently TrueNAS. So i’m not sure why this is though, but I will try to setup a mirror and test the performance without SLOG. iX provides VM and containers without support under CORE as well. a very nascent 12+ months platform Scale. That said, with how you plan on upgrading the drives, UNRAID seems to be the best method. 3 to be a bit faster. After some reading, I found places that say mirroring is faster than RAIDz1. 0 and the software is expected to mature further in 2025. video/truenasLawrence Systems Forum Posthttps://forums. There are also differences about performance between CORE and SCALE. "Core vs virtual core vs thread ?" Similar threads L. The ZFS side of SCALE has been very solid and gets extensively tested. I have 2 x 1gig circuits @ home and with the Truecharts Core, especially at the speeds you want. (assuming that's possible) TrueNAS CORE test system: CASE: Old Silverstone HTPC case MB: ASUS x-99M WS CPU: Xeon E5-2620v4 + Corsair H60 Cooler block RAM: CRUCIAL 32GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMMs HDD: WD RED 8TBx3 OS: 1 x Kingston UV400 120GB SSD - boot drive PSU: Corsair RM1000 Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. I'm running plex and all the supporting apps on Scale and it's Lawrence Systems just posted a video with the results of some performance testing with CORE 12 vs CORE 13 vs SCALE. 11. 2 is the Current Version. 60GHz. 1) on my home NAS/VM box. TrueNAS Scale VM offers excellent performance for file storage and sharing, benefiting from the ZFS. I ESXi (free) 8. Intel NICs And SSD ZIL and L2ARC Performance Testing The purpose of this test is to show the TrueNAS. But core still have a very subtle speed performance advantage - especially for just SMB. Lawrence Systems recently published a performance-focused video with benchmarks of TrueNAS CORE 12-U8. Given that Core is going to die a slow death I thought I would give Scale a try for that build. the performance with the current SAS pool, without SLOG, is not great. My iPerf tests show a pretty saturated 40Gbe connection between my main system and the truenas system. Both platforms offer excellent performance, but TrueNAS SCALE may have an Scale does everything core can plus much more! I have an n5105, with 4x 2. 04-BETA1 MB: ASUS P10S-I Series RAM: 32 GB CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) If you were planning on running all the same drive, I would suggest you look at TrueNAS scale instead. Run TrueNAS Core as the baseline, and move the docker VM to run off of the NAS as a VM in Core Run TrueNAS Scale, and run docker directly off of the NAS. 0-U2 CPU: i7 920 RAM: 24GB drr3 1066mhz NIC: Asus 10Gbit with raidz2 4x14TB Exos and 250GB SSD L2ARC cache. I like how Hi! I had a system with this specs: Truenas Core 13. Using TrueNAS SCALE to build a "Datacenter In a Box" Using LTO Tapes to Does Scale allow backups etc the same way as Core (ie SMB shares)? Maybe my best bet is: 1. 04-BETA1 64GB RAM 10th Generation Intel i7 Samsung NVME SSD 1TB, QVO SSD 1TB Boot from Samsung Portable T7 SSD USBC As part of the buildout of a high performance AMD Epyc based TrueNAS Core build, I ran into an issue where only 16 of the 24 TrueNAS CORE test system: CASE: Old Silverstone HTPC case MB: ASUS x-99M WS CPU: Xeon E5-2620v4 + Corsair H60 Cooler block RAM: CRUCIAL 32GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMMs HDD: WD RED 8TBx3 OS: 1 x Kingston UV400 120GB SSD - boot drive PSU: Corsair RM1000 Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. I will probably be looking into setting Version: TrueNAS CORE 13. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS I have been using TrueNAS for some time and I would like your help with the following findings. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS-SCALE (Bluefin) Boot from mirrored 100GB Intel DC3710 BigPool: 8 * Seagate Exos 12TB HDD in 4 * mirrored pairs + 2 18TB Toshiba MG08 + Optane 900P as SLOG + Mirrored Special (800GB Intel DC S3610) SSDPool: 6 * DC S3610 1. Features – Enhancing the Gaming Environment I ran dozens of more tests, but these are the relevant ones for comparison. 1 SCALE Cluster: 2x Intel NUCs running TrueNAS I'm getting poor performance in iperf3 compared to what I got when running TrueNAS Core on the same system/hardware. lyp dhyeh oei yhrrqi zzejh rhczw qtzsg ersd ets hakef