- Cisco fortigate lacp If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled on FGT Fortigate LACP debug The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " It's not mandatory to match but it should work with both nodes being active (maybe Cisco doesn't like the Fortinet LACP PDU), anyway having one side configured as active does the job fully since it still puts the problematic port immediately down and not cause any packet drops. diag netlink interface list to-Cisco. I have Fortigate 200E and 100D pairs running 5. I am having issues with an LACP port channel coming up on the Fortigate VM and Cisco switch in GNS3. Forti Member1 > Switch 2. You should add them to two different groups. This way, one switch could fail without forcing the FGT to fail over, just reducing bandwidth. cisco tarafında öncelikle firmware'i yükselttim stabilite açısından 15. Forti Member2 > Switch 1. EN US By Roel van Wanrooy 13/09/2019 #fortinet, #fortigate, #fortiswitch, #lacp, #port-channel, #cisco configure a LACP Port-Channel between FortiSwitch and Cisco Switch I recently had to configure a LACP port-channel between two FortiSwitches and a stack of two Cisco switches. It's slower to failover though as the standby then needs to start up its LACP negotiation, the recommended design is a LAG per FG It's not mandatory to match but it should work with both nodes being active (maybe Cisco doesn't like the Fortinet LACP PDU), anyway having one side configured as active does the job fully since it still puts the problematic port immediately down and not cause any packet drops. It's a Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set Hello, We have a Fortigate 1100 connected to a Cisco NX-3548 with 2 LACP links for WAN internet access . 1. edit "LAN" set vdom "root" set allowaccess ping set type aggregate set member "port2" "port3" set role lan set snmp-index 12 set lacp-mode static . LACP mode either is "active" (FGT negotiating) or "passive" (awaiting negos). Our setup looks as following: On the switch we see that the fortigate doesn't send any LACP packets: switch1# show lacp counters. LACP port Admin Oper Port Port Port Flags Priority Dev ID Age key Key The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set Hi, As you are creating layer 3 LACP on Fortigate which is untagged, you should configure "switchport mode access" at Cisco side. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast We've connected my customer's 1500D cluster cross-wise to a HPE switch stack, using 2x 2port LACP trunks. LACP port Admin Oper Port Port Port Flags Priority Dev ID Age key Key The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set member " port1" " Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set Hi Everyone, We have two nexus 9K switches need to connect to FORTIGATE Firewall (HA-Active and standby). But keep in mind that by default FortiGate will not monitor Port-Channel's ports status. It didn't load share! If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. g. The stack acts just like one single switch, even for LACP trunks. Forti Fortigate and Cisco switch LACP not working Hi! I am testing topology where fortigate connected to switch. This is because interfaces on passive device are not active and fortigate uses a virtual mac address that is managed by active member. Select Create. LACP간 통신 확인 및 최소 2개의 링크가 업 상태일 경우 작동 확인 LACP : 여러 개의 물리적인 링크를 하나로 묶어서 하나의 논리적 링크로사용하는 기술 (대역폭 확대 , 포트가 속한 LAN의 프레임만 수용가능) 1. 1. To support redundancy, the LACP groups on the switch for the FortiControllers in chassis 1 slot 1 and chassis 3 slot 1 are on one VLAN (in the example I am setting up a 2 ethernet trunk between a Cisco switch and Fortinet 100E firewall. Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " Trying to get a trunk built between a Cisco Catalyst switch and a Forigate 100F using two 10G links in an LCAP link-aggregation configuration. I also show how to configure LACP on a UniFi switc Hello all, can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. But I do not get the aggregation online. can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. edit "LAN" set vdom "root" set allowaccess ping set type aggregate set member "port2" "port3" set role lan set snmp-index 12 set lacp-mode static Cisco Switch interface Ethernet0/2 switchport trunk encapsulation LACP fortigate - Cisco switch I have configured LACP link (2 port) on Cisco 3560 and FG310B, everything seem be fine, but when I put traffic on this LACP link, traffic just rided on one physical link, when I shutdown one port of LACP, traffic switch to another. Tiếp theo ta tiến hành bước kiểm tra. Hello, is it possible to create LACP port-channel against Cisco nexus extenders ? I need to create layer 2 port-channels as trunks and carry different VLANs. It didn't load share! can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. 3ad aggregate connected to Cisco 3850 switches. experts This instruction describes the configuration of a LACP Port-Channel between FortiSwitch and Cisco managed by a FortiGate One Fortigate 100D firewall there. It's a pretty basic LACP config on the Cisco side that I have done with other Cisco switches and Palo Alto firewalls and never had an issue with before. has anyone build a setup where you can transport LACP transparent over a FortiGate? Our Setup is that the FortiGate will be installed between two Cisco devices which have configured LACP. My configuration works correctly singularly however, when i try and aggregate the ports, i get the following LACP Gi0/1(P) EDGE1# Number of channel-groups in use: 1 Number of aggregators: 1 If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. FortiGate LACP 설정 Cisco (14) L2 Switch (0) L3 Switch (0 On the switch we see that the fortigate doesn't send any LACP packets: switch1# show lacp counters. FortiGate Aggregate Config. Last I found the configuration with dot1q command which is not supported anymore. If you do the setup as your design, FortiGate will detect different switches on the ports, and one of the ports will work and the other will not. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled on FGT Fortigate LACP debug 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled Như vậy là chúng ta đã cấu hình xong LACP trên cả firewall Fortigate và switch Cisco. 4. Alphabetical; FortiGate 4,799 For the mode, select Static, LACP Active, LACP Passive, or Fortinet Trunk. edit <trunk name> set aggregator-mode {bandwidth | count} set description <description_string> set members <ports> Both the physical interfaces and the aggregate interface are showing as up on the Fortigate but the Cisco side is showing the etherchannel and physical ports as not connected. Cisco Switch . I am thinking that LACP flapping occurs. All should be connected directly to fortigate . Connec Try and set the Cisco to channel-mode 'on' and the Fortigate to 'set lacp-mode static' (if that is not the Fortigate config already) 0 Helpful Reply. CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. No lights The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. The LACP link comes up but Here is the full configuration road map at FortiGate FW and cisco switch. I've the same issue during fortigate and cisco n7k integration. Here, you've told the Cisco LACP/Switchport trunk to transmit VLAN#10 as untagged on that LACP Trunk. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. Im still digging into this and trying to figure out why the negotiation between the fortigate and cisco switch doesnt want to cooperate. FortiGate Site: FGT1 (LACP-CORE) # show config system interface edit "LACP-CORE" set vdom "root" set type aggregate set If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. You must configure a command under the Fortigate LACP configuration "Set minimum link 2". This works so far except for LACP. Post Reply Announcements. FGT100D-HA1 (root) # diag n In this video I show you how I configure LACP on a FortiGate 60E. Para pasar tráfico de multiples VLANs, y pr 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. EDGE1 EDGE2 \ / \ / \ / Fortigate . Cisco Switch We have a Cisco 6807-XL that has four 1gb fiber connections to a Fortigate firewall that is not coming up. The LACP link comes up but the VLAN communication does not work. We have almost 30 plus VLANs configured in new switches. If you have Cisco Stack then you can create LACP as below FGT1 port1 and port2 lacp ---- SW gig1/0/1 and I am trying to setup a LAG between a Fortigate 1200D cluster and a two Cisco Nexus switches. Community. Regards, Deepak Kumar The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " After that both side configure LACP Ether channel. 3ad aggregate. I can not get x1 to show up and both x1/x2 interfaces on firewall 2 are down as well. I'm trying to LACP trunk a pair of Nexus3000 C3064PQ Chassis running 7. cisco switch'te > usb kabloyla cihaza putty ile bağlanıp > show vlan br So your sw1's port-channel(if Cisco) works always 1Gig, not 2Gig. The FortiGate should just analyze the traffic and should be transparent for the Cisco's. Here is the configuration on the Fortigate: Here, you've told the Cisco LACP/Switchport trunk to transmit VLAN#10 as untagged on that LACP Trunk. Fortinet-201F-Primary (CORE-UPLINK) # show So your sw1's port-channel(if Cisco) works always 1Gig, not 2Gig. 0(3)I7(9) with a Fortigate 300D running it's ports in an 802. This would typically mean that an LACP-capable device Once you configure an aggregated interface with LACP enabled, LACP packets are broadcast to other directly connected devices (such as switches and routers), which will create the Hi, As you are creating layer 3 LACP on Fortigate which is untagged, you should configure "switchport mode access" at Cisco side. I swear I've used this same configuration in the past and it worked, but it isn't working now. Trying to get a trunk built between a Cisco Catalyst switch and a Forigate 100F using two 10G links in an LCAP link-aggregation configuration. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled on FGT Fortigate LACP debug It's not mandatory to match but it should work with both nodes being active (maybe Cisco doesn't like the Fortinet LACP PDU), anyway having one side configured as active does the job fully since it still puts the problematic port immediately down and not cause any packet drops. Then when FG1 goes down the SW1 can failover the 2Gig to FG2. So your sw1's port-channel(if Cisco) works always 1Gig, not 2Gig. 2 and get replies from the Fortinet 192. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's Cấu hình LACP giữa Fortigate và Switch Cisco. Fortinet Community; Forums; I'm trying to create a LAG between a virtual fortigate appliance and two 3650 cisco switches. Labels. So far the below is working (i can ping from Cisco 192. I had to do it (unfortunately) in specific circumstances and it worked - Fortigate to 2 Cisco switches w/o LACP. created policy as per the sub interface, in the policy you can Fortigate LACP is created rather simple - new interface -> 802. Solution The scenario is described as follows: An aggregate link (LACP) is configured on both devices acting one as Primary and the other one as Secondary (Active - Passive mode). Here is the configuration on the Fortigate: The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set We've connected my customer's 1500D cluster cross-wise to a HPE switch stack, using 2x 2port LACP trunks. 2 HA active/passive configured as follows in over 10 physical locations: Fortinet WAN1 and WAN2 ports in 802. 1 The LACP fallback mode is useful if you have a preboot execution Estoy configurando una troncal de 2 ethernet entre un switch Cisco y el firewall Fortinet 100E. 6. My configuration works correctly singularly however, when i try and aggregate the ports, i get the following LACP Gi0/1(P) EDGE1# Number of channel-groups in use: 1 Number of aggregators: 1 You can not configure LACP on Cisco with 2 different Fortigate devices. interface Ethernet0/2 switchport trunk encapsulation 一方、LACPはリンクダウンにて経路の状態を判断しているのではなく、定期的に「LACP Ciscoはリンクアグリゲーションではなく「ポートチャネル」と呼びます。 設定したい複数の物理ポートを「チャネルグループ」というグループに所属させます Trying to get a trunk built between a Cisco Catalyst switch and a Forigate 100F using two 10G links in an LCAP link-aggregation configuration. En este lab realizamos una configuración de LACP (Link Aggregation), entre un FortiGate físico y un Switch Cisco. I noticed that etherchannel haves different aggregator ID on Fortigate and act as secondary aggregator also on Cisco (6509E). It didn't load share! Fortigate and Cisco switch LACP not working Hi! I am testing topology where fortigate connected to switch. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. One port-channel for Active FortiGate and second for the secondary F ortiGate. Solution . if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast You can have all Fortigate ports going to the same switch LAG, but you need set lacp-ha-slave disable on the standby unit so it doesn't actively try to form LACP while the active unit is also doing LACP. bunları fortigate'in 1 ve 2 nolu portlarına taktım. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's It's not mandatory to match but it should work with both nodes being active (maybe Cisco doesn't like the Fortinet LACP PDU), anyway having one side configured as active does the job fully since it still puts the problematic port immediately down and not cause any packet drops. Config onFortigate. 2. FGT100D-HA1 (root) # diag n Hello all, can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test oh here is the LACP diags on the Cisco, not sure how to do the same for Fortigate SW1#sh lacp neighbor Flags: S - Device is requesting Slow LACPDUs F - Device is requesting Fast LACPDUs A - Device is in Active mode P - Device is in Passive mode. LACP port Admin Oper Port Port Port Flags Priority Dev ID Age key Key なお、デフォルトでは LACP を使うため、Static で LAG 構成にするには CLI で以下のようにします。 fg60e # config system interface fg60e (interface) # edit lag1 fg60e (lag1) # set lacp-mode static 3. If you have multiple VLANs span on FortiGate, you should modify the FortiGate's interface For LAG control, the FortiSwitch unit supports the industry-standard Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). For some reason, the Cisco switches are showing the WAN2 ports on 4 of the pairs as not sending LACP traffic. Both the physical interfaces and the aggregate interface are showing as up on the Fortigate but the Cisco side is showing the etherchannel and physical ports as not connected. Scope FortiGate in HA. Here is the configuration on the Fortigate: can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. 1 adet Cisco WS-C2960X-48TS-L (ana switch) cisco switch 1 ve 2 nolu portlarını lacp modunda birleştirdim. interface Port-channel 30 switchport access vlan x switchport mode access interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12 switchport trunk allowed vlan x switchport mode access channel-group 30 mode active If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. at that time connectity lost between fortigate firewall and cisco switches oh here is the LACP diags on the Cisco, not sure how to do the same for Fortigate SW1#sh lacp neighbor Flags: S - Device is requesting Slow LACPDUs F - Device is requesting Fast LACPDUs A - Device is in Active mode P - Device is in Passive mode. but aggregate will come up. If you have Cisco Stack then you can create LACP as below FGT1 port1 and port2 lacp ---- SW gig1/0/1 and Fortigate and Cisco switch LACP not working Hi! I am testing topology where fortigate connected to switch. Simple misunderstanding that caught me up too: So on the Fortinet side, you need to specify a the matching native/untagged ("Native") VLAN for the LACP LAG/Channel for your Layer3 interface. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast We have a Cisco 6807-XL that has four 1gb fiber connections to a Fortigate firewall that is not coming up. the behavior of LACP in an HA cluster. LACP port Admin Oper Port Port Port Flags Priority Dev ID Age key Key Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set I'm trying to create a LAG between a virtual fortigate appliance and two 3650 cisco switches. Customer requirement is that we user one port from switch one and second port from switch 2 and connect both port to fortigate side. I configured both side active -active LACP after that its working perfect . CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name Test The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " Fortigate and Cisco switch LACP not working Hi! I am testing topology where fortigate connected to switch. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. Hasta el momento, lo siguiente está servidores cisco Toggle navigation EnMiMaquinaFunciona . The other way around is possible. The FortiSwitch unit supports LACP in active and passive modes. These are 10G fiber connections. My LACP is up but no traffic passes through. Don't put the ports of both FortiGate units in one LACP group on the switch. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set Hi, I am trying to setup a LAG between a Fortigate 1200D cluster and a two Cisco Nexus switches. FortiOS. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's I am trying to setup a LACP connection from 2 clustered Fortigate 201F FW to two stacked Cisco 9300x24Y switches via (4) 10 Gb SFP+ direct attach data storage cables as seen below. The Topology setup is as follows: Here the FortiGate is in an Active-Passive Setup Trying to get a trunk built between a Cisco Catalyst switch and a Forigate 100F using two 10G links in an LCAP link-aggregation configuration. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast It's not mandatory to match but it should work with both nodes being active (maybe Cisco doesn't like the Fortinet LACP PDU), anyway having one side configured as active does the job fully since it still puts the problematic port immediately down and not cause any packet drops. 1 Process Ethernet frames with Cisco Security Group Tag and VLAN tag Support port block allocation for NAT64 Support refreshing active sessions for specific protocols and port ranges per VDOM in a specified direction 7. I have a port channel (4 interfaces) betwenn a Cisco and a Fortinet D500 (firewall) and the issues is this: when i have the four interfaces. On switch 2 both ports come up fine (P/P) but on switch 1 I get (P/s) Trying to get a trunk built between a Cisco Catalyst switch and a Forigate 100F using two 10G links in an LCAP link-aggregation configuration. Forti Member2 > Switch 2 リンクアグリゲーションとはリンクアグリゲーションとは、複数の Ethernet ポートを論理的に 1 つに見せる L2 冗長化&負荷分散技術です。L2 の冗長化技術と言えば昔はスパニングツリーでしたが、リンクアグリゲーションがスパニングツリ If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. Add the required ports to the Included list. balaji. I have setup the routing policy, Firewall, and aggregate links on the Fortigate. Mô hình: Yêu cầu: - Cấu hình LACP giữa FGT và switch Cisco - Tạo interface vlan 100 với IP như quy hoạch để làm gateway cho các PC phía dưới (thuộc vlan 100) Trên switch cisco khai LACP: If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. if=to-Cisco family=00 type=1 index=19 mtu=1500 link=0 master=0 ref=21 state=start present no_carrier fw_flags=8800 flags=up broadcast master multicast So your sw1's port-channel(if Cisco) works always 1Gig, not 2Gig. It didn't load share! Hi! I am testing topology where fortigate connected to switch. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled on FGT Fortigate LACP debug Solved: Hi all, I've been running a Fortigate 61E in LAG mode (ie: static) on an Edgeswitch for some months now and it has worked well. Here is an example of one Port: Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's So your sw1's port-channel(if Cisco) works always 1Gig, not 2Gig. So each chassis has two LACP groups. If you have Cisco Stack then you can create LACP as below FGT1 port1 and port2 lacp ---- SW gig1/0/1 and oh here is the LACP diags on the Cisco, not sure how to do the same for Fortigate SW1#sh lacp neighbor Flags: S - Device is requesting Slow LACPDUs F - Device is requesting Fast LACPDUs A - Device is in Active mode P - Device is in Passive mode. In some heavy network traffic days ( three times in six months ) Both of two LACP links to Cisco NX gets blocked. Top Labels. interface Ethernet0/2 switchport trunk encapsulation The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " You can not configure LACP on Cisco with 2 different Fortigate devices. CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name Test LACP fortigate - Cisco switch I have configured LACP link (2 port) on Cisco 3560 and FG310B, everything seem be fine, but when I put traffic on this LACP link, traffic just rided on one physical link, when I shutdown one port of LACP, traffic switch to another. 3ad aggregation and port added. Regístrate Tronco LACP de Cisco a Fortinet Preguntado el 14 de Octubre, 2017 Cuando se hizo la pregunta 256 visitas Cuantas visitas ha tenido la pregunta I am trying to create at LACP group but all of the fortigate interfaces show down except firewall 1, x2. My suggestion to go with L2 to port-channel with VLAN. It is also enough to unplug one cable from the LACP for there to be a failure. Our setup looks as following: I know this setup is a little bit uncommon because normally you would connect the fortigates to both switches but because of li 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. Check out our Community Chatter Blog! Click here to get involved. If I want connect new nexus switches to fortigates, do i need to use access port or trunk port. Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set Learn how to configure Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) on FortiGate and Cisco switches in this video tutorial. Kết quả trả về Po1 hiển thị SU là đã kết nối link LACP thành công. 2(7)E7 firmware ver. then assigned these port to subinterface. Can you please help in this case. This is my design: 2 uplinks, each to different extender -this will be in WAN vlan 2 more uplinks, each to different extender - this will be It's possible to use on Fortigate 100F fortilink interface as normal trunk interface for cisco switch ? My config is fortigate with two fortiswitch and two cisco switch . LACP fortigate - Cisco switch I have configured LACP link (2 port) on Cisco 3560 and FG310B, everything seem be fine, but when I put traffic on this LACP link, traffic just rided on one physical link, when I shutdown one port of LACP, traffic switch to another. Fortigate Confi: edit "aggregate" set vdom "root" set allowaccess https ssh set type aggregate set member "port1" "port2" set alias "LAG1-2" set snmp-index 12set lacp-speed slow next Cisco side: The cluster includes two FortiGate-5000 chassis. during a firmware update, the LACP port to the Cisco switch goes offline for 1 min or longer. Qs: are these switchports on the same switch ( VSS or standalone ) same blade 327 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet4/4 description FORTIGATE-HA1 switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 6,153-155,210,240,242-247,250,260,270,280 can you please tell me where can I find up to date configuration for the LACP between cisco and fortigate. there is no clear information available on how to do this. The Cisco Nexus 3000 switch requires four LACP groups, one for each of the FortiController LACP groups. Here is the configuration on the Fortigate: It sounds like your 2 cisco ports switches are not correct in neg-LACP. This article describes a glimpse of the configuration of LACP between the FortiGate firewall and Cisco Switch. CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name Test 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. Kiểm tra cấu hình. Using the CLI: config switch trunk. But I was able to get Fortilink up with a Catalyst 9200, just need to add the interfaces to a port channel and enable LACP. But when custoemer reboot firewall device one of cisco port went to supspend state after reset this port will be in Present mode. Regards, 6401 0 Kudos Reply. In active As a primer, LACP link-aggregation is designed to connect one Layer 2 device to another using one logical interface composed of multiple redundant members. Both nodes set as passive will not work and having static it's oh here is the LACP diags on the Cisco, not sure how to do the same for Fortigate SW1#sh lacp neighbor Flags: S - Device is requesting Slow LACPDUs F - Device is requesting Fast LACPDUs A - Device is in Active mode P - Device is in Passive mode. CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name Test Hello, I would like to know if some of you have a recommendation for a configuration between a Cisco switch port-channel and a Fortigate Agg FortiOS5 On my Cisco configuration I' ve used this for the physical interfaces channel-group 1 mode active switchport nonegotiate On the Fortigate I have edit " Agg1" set vdom " root" set type aggregate set It's not mandatory to match but it should work with both nodes being active (maybe Cisco doesn't like the Fortinet LACP PDU), anyway having one side configured as active does the job fully since it still puts the problematic port immediately down and not cause any packet drops. It might re-establish a new LACP neighboring with FG2 when FG1 goes down in your set up. interface Port-channel 30 switchport access vlan x switchport mode access interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12 switchport trunk allowed vlan x switchport mode access cha The below are the configs we' re using: Cisco: interface Port-channel1 description uplink to FortigateFW switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-150,200-250,300-350 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk end Fortigate: config system interface edit " LACP VLAN Group" set vdom " Blah" set type aggregate set member " You can not configure LACP on Cisco with 2 different Fortigate devices. Scope . The aggregate link is comprised of the primary's de. interface Ethernet0/2 switchport trunk encapsulation I'm trying to create a LAG between a virtual fortigate appliance and two 3650 cisco switches. Information about how the two devices are connected together for this LACP bundle (direct cables or fibers/Intermediate L2 or metro device between the FortiGate and the other device). The 2 lines in a LACP trunk terminate on 2 different chassis in the stack. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Forti Cluster with LACP connect CISCO SVI Switch Forti Cluster with LACP connect CISCO SVI Switch Hi Kindly advise we have a requirement to configure as below, Forti Member1 > Switch 1. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled on FGT Fortigate LACP debug Forti Cluster with LACP connect CISCO SVI Switch Hi Kindly advise we have a requirement to configure as below, Forti Member1 > Switch 1. HA doesn't fail-over L2 protocols like LACP. Channel group 1 neighbors. by HaiNguyen -IT | 06/01/2023 | Lượt xem: 7047. VLAN インタフェースを複数作成する LACP fortigate - Cisco switch I have configured LACP link (2 port) on Cisco 3560 and FG310B, everything seem be fine, but when I put traffic on this LACP link, traffic just rided on one physical link, when I shutdown one port of LACP, traffic switch to another. Each node in FG Cluster configured with their own ether channel. Buy or Renew. bandi. The following information should be provided when opening a ticket with TAC Support for an LACP issue: The FortiGate configuration file. After As you are creating layer 3 LACP on Fortigate which is untagged, you should configure "switchport mode access" at Cisco side. You have to have two GigE connections go in both FG1 and FT2 to do regular LACP. Static is (AFAIR) Cisco legacy mode bonding. If you feel adventurous, try doing LACP with debug enabled on FGT Fortigate LACP debug I am having issues with an LACP port channel coming up on the Fortigate VM and Cisco switch in GNS3. 1): I would recommend against changing the native VLAN as doing otherwise can hit a number of Cisco LACP bugs that result in LACP PDUs being tagged Trying to get a trunk built between a Cisco Catalyst switch and a Forigate 100F using two 10G links in an LCAP link-aggregation configuration. I connect it to a Cisco switch and test. Both the physical interfaces and the aggregate interface are showing as up on the Fortigate but the Cisco side is showing the etherchannel and Hello, we have LACP with two port on each of two nodes of A-A cluster configured. Ede Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! Ede Kernel panic: Aiee 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name test CHZHSTFW01 # diagnose netlink aggregate name Test Hello, we have LACP with two port on each of two nodes of A-A cluster configured. If you configure LACP on FortiGate you have to consider a point. Created aggrate interface port3 & port 4. Cisco config is based on: https://www. Kiểm tra trên switch Cisco, ta sử dụng câu lệnh show etherchannel summary. Fortigate Confi: edit "aggregate" set vdom "root" set allowaccess https ssh set type aggregate set member "port1" "port2" set alias "LAG1-2" set snmp-index 12 set lacp-mode active next Cisco side: whenever the FortiGate makes a failover, e. 168. Here is the configuration on the Fortigate: Configuring FortiGate LAN extension the GUI 7. LACP configuration between fortigate and cisco 105 Views; Fortigate & Fortilogger Config and Hotspot 99 Views; View all. EDGE1 EDGE2 \ / \ / \ / Fortigate LACP Gi0/1(P) EDGE1# Number of channel-groups in use: 1 Number of aggregators Hi Kindly advise we have a requirement to configure as below, Forti Member1 > Switch 1. NOTE: Clear lacp counters to get accurate statistics 1 name fortilink status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active 2 name to-Cisco status down algorithm L4 lacp-mode active. 4. mskktpnt pfizqz ywjkqkd fkdy hfwxt cey tgxp vweic vyrye psj pbu qjtl lis srkcg ronxtg